• Announcements

    • Heather

      Mormon Hub Rules - Please be familiar with these rules before posting   04/17/08

        Any views expressed on Mormon Hub are independent of and do not represent the views of Mormon Hub, More Good Foundation, or Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Site Rules 1. Do not post, upload, or otherwise submit anything to the site that is derogatory towards The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, its teachings, or its leaders. Anti-LDS Propaganda will not be tolerated anywhere. 2. Please be conscious of the fact that although Mormon Hub is aimed towards an LDS audience, that the membership of this site consists of friends from an array of different backgrounds, beliefs, and cultures. Please be respectful and courteous to all, and know that everyone who is willing to follow the Rules and Terms of Mormon Hub are welcome to participate and be a member of Mormon Hub. Keep in mind that anything posted, uploaded, or otherwise displayed on the site should be understandable to friends of other faiths as well as to members. Please define any LDS vocabulary that friends of other faiths may not understand (i.e. Mutual, Relief Society, and Deacon.) 3. Personal attacks, name calling, flaming, and judgments against other members will not be tolerated. 4. No bickering and nit-picking toward others. Realize that sometimes it is very difficult to be able to express how one feels through written words. Please be courteous and ask for a further explanation, rather then trying to attack and find holes in someone else's post. 5. No cursing or crude language. Any swearing, including filter skipping, will result in an automatic one week suspension. 6. Posting issues you have with a moderator or administrator anywhere on the site will not be allowed. Please follow the chain of authority if you have any concerns. Any such posts will be removed and the poster will be subject to the consequences of breaking the rules. List of site moderators Course of action that should be taken if you have a concern: - Send a message directly to the moderator you have a concern about. If you are unable to work out the problem then, - Send a message to the head moderators. - If after you have approached both avenues, you may then send a message to Heather; however know that Heather is very unlikely to over rule anything that has been sanctioned by the moderators and head moderators. 7. Multiple accounts are not allowed and will result in all accounts being banned from the site. 8. Please do not share any "true" or "faith promoting" stories, unless you can verify the source. 9. Do not post any copyrighted material, unless the copyright is owned by you. 10. Bigoted/racial/ethnic comments will not be tolerated. Political Neutrality Policy More Good Foundation, as a nonprofit foundation, must remain neutral with respect to partisan politics and candidate campaigns for public office. The foundation encourages its members and staff to be informed about political issues and to be engaged in civic life; however, it does not endorse or oppose any political parties, candidates, or platforms. Mormon Hub will allow political discussion, also long as all posts remain neutral with respect to partisan politics and candidate campaigns for public office. You may not use the site to show support, endorse, oppose or sanction any candidate. In addition, all posts must be respectful and sensitive to readers of all political beliefs and backgrounds. Any post that violates any of the above conditions will be dealt with according to the consequences of breaking the rules. As a non-profit organization, 501©3, we are governed by legal constraints relative to writing, blogging, or otherwise endorsing any candidate running for political office. The law states, in effect, that no one acting on behalf of the nonprofit can intervene directly or indirectly in the election process by endorsing a political candidate. Any post that speaks favorably about one candidate, even in a religious context, can be construed as indirect intervention in the election process. While journalists are presently exempt from this provision, bloggers and forum-members are not. 12. You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this site to post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of any law. 13. You will not use this site to solicit the sale of any product, service or website. You will not use this site to promote a money making venture or contest. If appropriate, you may post a link to your personal website or to your business on your profile, in your forum signature, and you make create one post in the web link section of the forum. Do not post any link or discuss any business, service, or website that violates any rule of Mormon Hub. Mormon Hub is not responsible for the content of any site linked on Mormon Hub. Consequences to these rules could result in the following, and are determined on a case by case basis. Anything that an Administrator or Moderator determines is more than just an infraction of the rules, will result in immediate banning from the site and/or legal action: First infraction will result in a warning and a message from a moderator on what rule was broken. Second infraction will result in a one week suspension followed by a two week moderator post approval Third infraction will result in banned from the site for good. Any topic, message, video, music, image, or other upload or submission to the site that breaks any rules will be deleted. Please remember that we are not responsible for anything posted or uploaded. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message or upload. We are not responsible for the contents of any message, video, image, post or upload. The messages express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Mormon Hub , More Good Foundation, or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Any user who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to contact the Administration immediately by Private Message, Email, or Report a Post. We will make every effort to remove objectionable messages and uploads within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary. Mormon Hub Terms of Use Agreement January 8, 2008 Mormon Hub is a social networking service that allows Members to create unique personal profiles online in order to find and communicate with old and new friends. Mormon Hub refers to "Mormon Hub or its proprietors." The services offered by Mormon Hub ("Mormon Hub" or "we") include the Mormon Hub website (the "Mormon Hub Website"), the Mormon Hub Internet messaging service, and any other features, content, or applications offered from time to time by Mormon Hub in connection with the Mormon Hub Website (collectively, the "Mormon Hub Services"). The Mormon Hub Services are hosted in the U.S. This Terms of Use Agreement ("Agreement") sets forth the legally binding terms for your use of the Mormon Hub Services. By using the Mormon Hub Services, you agree to be bound by this Agreement, whether you are a "Visitor" (which means that you simply browse the Mormon Hub Website) or you are a "Member" (which means that you have registered with Mormon Hub). The term "User" refers to a Visitor or a Member. You are only authorized to use the Mormon Hub Services (regardless of whether your access or use is intended) if you agree to abide by all applicable laws and to this Agreement. Please read this Agreement carefully and save it. If you do not agree with it, you should leave the Mormon Hub Website and discontinue use of the Mormon Hub Services immediately. If you wish to become a Member, communicate with other Members and make use of the Mormon Hub Services, you must read this Agreement and indicate your acceptance during the Registration process. This Agreement includes Mormon Hub's policy for acceptable use of the Mormon Hub Services and Content posted on the Mormon Hub Website, your rights, obligations and restrictions regarding your use of the Mormon Hub Services and Mormon Hub's Privacy Policy. In order to participate in certain Mormon Hub Services, you may be notified that you are required to download software or content and/or agree to additional terms and conditions. Unless otherwise provided by the additional terms and conditions applicable to the Mormon Hub Services in which you choose to participate, those additional terms are hereby incorporated into this Agreement.  Mormon Hub may modify this Agreement from time to time and such modification shall be effective upon posting by Mormon Hub on the Mormon Hub Website. You agree to be bound to any changes to this Agreement when you use the Mormon Hub Services after any such modification is posted. It is therefore important that you review this Agreement regularly to ensure you are updated as to any changes. Please choose carefully the information you post on Mormon Hub and that you provide to other Users. You may NOT include any of the following information anywhere on Mormon Hub, including private messages: telephone numbers, street addresses, last names, and any photographs containing nudity, or obscene, lewd, excessively violent, harassing, sexually explicit or otherwise objectionable subject matter. Email addresses should NEVER be posted to the general public. Despite this prohibition, information provided by other Mormon Hub Members (for instance, in their Profile) may contain inaccurate, inappropriate, offensive or sexually explicit material, products or services, and Mormon Hub assumes no responsibility or liability for this material. If you become aware of misuse of the Mormon Hub Services by any person, please contact Mormon Hub or click on the "Report Inappropriate Content" link at the bottom of any Mormon Hub page. Mormon Hub reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to moderate, reject, refuse to post or remove any posting (including private messages) by you, or to restrict, suspend, or terminate your access to all or any part of the Mormon Hub Services at any time, for any or no reason, with or without prior notice, and without liability. Mormon Hub expressly reserves the right to remove your profile and/or restrict, suspend, or terminate your access to any part of Mormon Hub Services if Mormon Hub determines, in its sole discretion, that you pose a threat to Mormon Hub and/or its Users. Mormon Hub reserves the right to ask a member to change their username if it is found to be offensive or can be perceived as offensive. Due to the sacredness, this would include any usernames that include, Jesus, Christ, God, Lord, names of Prophets, General authorities etc. The names of personal or business websites, blogs, etc. to promote said sites is also prohibited. Using names of political figures or party affiliation is also prohibited. 1. Eligibility. Use of and Membership in the Mormon Hub Services is void where prohibited. By using the Mormon Hub Services, you represent and warrant that (a) all registration information you submit is truthful and accurate; ( B) you will maintain the accuracy of such information; © you are 14 years of age or older; and (d) your use of the Mormon Hub Services does not violate any applicable law or regulation. Your profile may be deleted and your Membership may be terminated without warning, if we believe that you are under 13 years of age. 2. Term. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect while you use the Mormon Hub Services or are a Member. You may terminate your Membership at any time, for any reason, emailing an admin. Mormon Hub may terminate your Membership at any time, without warning. Even after Membership is terminated, this Agreement will remain in effect, including sections 5-17. 3. Password. When you sign up to become a Member, you will also be asked to choose a password. You are entirely responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of your password. You agree not to use the account, username, or password of another Member at any time or to disclose your password to any third party. You agree to notify Mormon Hub immediately if you suspect any unauthorized use of your account or access to your password. You are solely responsible for any and all use of your account. 4. Non-commercial Use by Members. The Mormon Hub Services are for the personal use of Members only and may not be used in connection with any commercial endeavors except those that are specifically endorsed or approved by Mormon Hub. Illegal and/or unauthorized use of the Mormon Hub Services, including collecting usernames and/or email addresses of Members by electronic or other means for the purpose of sending unsolicited email or unauthorized framing of or linking to the Mormon Hub Website is prohibited. Commercial advertisements, affiliate links, and other forms of solicitation may be removed from Member profiles without notice and may result in termination of Membership privileges. Appropriate legal action will be taken for any illegal or unauthorized use of the Mormon Hub Services. 5. Proprietary Rights in Content on Mormon Hub. Mormon Hub does not claim any ownership rights in the text, files, images, photos, video, sounds, musical works, works of authorship, or any other materials (collectively, "Content") that you post to the Mormon Hub Services. After posting your Content to the Mormon Hub Services, you continue to retain all ownership rights in such Content, and you continue to have the right to use your Content in any way you choose. By displaying or publishing ("posting") any Content on or through the Mormon Hub Services, you hereby grant to Mormon Hub a limited license to use, modify, publicly perform, publicly display, reproduce, and distribute such Content solely on and through the Mormon Hub Services.
      Without this license, Mormon Hub would be unable to provide the Mormon Hub Services. For example, without the right to modify Member Content, Mormon Hub would not be able to digitally compress music files that Members submit or otherwise format Content to satisfy technical requirements, and without the right to publicly perform Member Content, Mormon Hub could not allow Users to listen to music posted by Members. The license you grant to Mormon Hub is non-exclusive (meaning you are free to license your Content to anyone else in addition to Mormon Hub), fully-paid and royalty-free (meaning that Mormon Hub is not required to pay you for the use on the Mormon Hub Services of the Content that you post), sublicensable (so that Mormon Hub is able to use its affiliates and subcontractors such as Internet content delivery networks to provide the Mormon Hub Services), and worldwide (because the Internet and the Mormon Hub Services are global in reach). This license will terminate at the time you remove your Content from the Mormon Hub Services. The license does not grant Mormon Hub the right to sell your Content, nor does the license grant Mormon Hub the right to distribute your Content outside of the Mormon Hub Services. You represent and warrant that: (i) you own the Content posted by you on or through the Mormon Hub Services or otherwise have the right to grant the license set forth in this section, and (ii) the posting of your Content on or through the Mormon Hub Services does not violate the privacy rights, publicity rights, copyrights, contract rights or any other rights of any person. You agree to pay for all royalties, fees, and any other monies owing any person by reason of any Content posted by you to or through the LDS.Mormon Hub Services. The Mormon Hub Services contain Content of Mormon Hub ("Mormon Hub Content"). Mormon Hub Content is protected by copyright, trademark, patent, trade secret and other laws, and Mormon Hub owns and retains all rights in the Mormon Hub Content and the Mormon Hub Services. Mormon Hub hereby grants you a limited, revocable, nonsublicensable license to reproduce and display the Mormon Hub Content (excluding any software code) solely for your personal use in connection with viewing the Mormon Hub Website and using the Mormon Hub Services. The Mormon Hub Services contain Content of Users and other Mormon Hub licensors. Except for Content posted by you, you may not copy, modify, translate, publish, broadcast, transmit, distribute, perform, display, or sell any Content appearing on or through the Mormon Hub Services.   6. Content Posted. Mormon Hub may delete any Content that in the sole judgment of Mormon Hub violates this Agreement or which may be offensive, illegal or violate the rights, harm, or threaten the safety of any person. Mormon Hub assumes no responsibility for monitoring the Mormon Hub Services for inappropriate Content or conduct. If at any time Mormon Hub chooses, in its sole discretion, to monitor the Mormon Hub Services, Mormon Hub nonetheless assumes no responsibility for the Content, no obligation to modify or remove any inappropriate Content, and no responsibility for the conduct of the User submitting any such Content. You are solely responsible for the Content that you post on or through any of the Mormon Hub Services, and any material or information that you transmit to other Members and for your interactions with other Users. Mormon Hub does not endorse and has no control over the Content. Content is not necessarily reviewed by Mormon Hub prior to posting and does not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of Mormon Hub. Mormon Hub makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the Content or to the accuracy and reliability of the Content or any material or information that you transmit to other Members.   7. Content/Activity Prohibited. The following is a partial list of the kind of Content that is illegal or prohibited to post on or through the Mormon Hub Services.Mormon Hub reserves the right to investigate and take appropriate legal action against anyone who, in Mormon Hub's sole discretion, violates this provision, including without limitation, removing the offending communication from the Mormon Hub Services and terminating the Membership of such violators. Prohibited Content includes, but is not limited to Content that, in the sole discretion of Mormon Hub: is patently offensive and promotes racism, bigotry, hatred or physical harm of any kind against any group or individual; harasses or advocates harassment of another person; exploits people in a sexual or violent manner; contains nudity, violence, or offensive subject matter or contains a link to an adult website; solicits personal information from anyone; provides any telephone numbers, street addresses, last names, URLs or email addresses; promotes information that you know is false or misleading or promotes illegal activities or conduct that is abusive, threatening, obscene, defamatory or libelous; promotes an illegal or unauthorized copy of another person's copyrighted work, such as providing pirated computer programs or links to them, providing information to circumvent manufacture-installed copy-protect devices, or providing pirated music or links to pirated music files; involves the transmission of "junk mail," "chain letters," or unsolicited mass mailing, instant messaging, "spimming," or "spamming"; contains restricted or password only access pages or hidden pages or images (those not linked to or from another accessible page); furthers or promotes any criminal activity or enterprise or provides instructional information about illegal activities including, but not limited to making or buying illegal weapons, violating someone's privacy, or providing or creating computer viruses; solicits passwords or personal identifying information for commercial or unlawful purposes from other Users; involves commercial activities and/or sales without our prior written consent such as contests, sweepstakes, barter, advertising, or pyramid schemes; includes a photograph of another person that you have posted without that person's consent; or uses sexually suggestive imagery or any other unfair, misleading or deceptive Content intended to draw traffic to the profile.
      The following is a partial list of the kind of activity that is illegal or prohibited on the Mormon Hub Website and through your use of the Mormon Hub Services. Mormon Hub reserves the right to investigate and take appropriate legal action against anyone who, in Mormon Hub's sole discretion, violates this provision, including without limitation, reporting you to law enforcement authorities. Prohibited activity includes, but is not limited to: criminal or tortuous activity, including child pornography, fraud, trafficking in obscene material, drug dealing, gambling, harassment, stalking, spamming, spimming, sending of viruses or other harmful files, copyright infringement, patent infringement, or theft of trade secrets; advertising to, or solicitation of, any Member to buy or sell any products or services through the Mormon Hub Services. You may not transmit any chain letters or junk email to other Members. It is also a violation of these rules to use any information obtained from the Mormon Hub Services in order to contact, advertise to, solicit, or sell to any Member without their prior explicit consent. In order to protect our Members from such advertising or solicitation, Mormon Hub reserves the right to restrict the number of emails which a Member may send to other Members in any 24-hour period to a number which Mormon Hub deems appropriate in its sole discretion. If you breach this Agreement and send unsolicited bulk email, instant messages or other unsolicited communications of any kind through the Mormon Hub Services, you acknowledge that you will have caused substantial harm to Mormon Hub, but that the amount of such harm would be extremely difficult to ascertain. As a reasonable estimation of such harm, you agree to pay Mormon Hub $50 for each such unsolicited email or other unsolicited communication you send through the Mormon Hub Services; covering or obscuring the banner advertisements on your personal profile page, or any Mormon Hub page via HTML/CSS or any other means; any automated use of the system, such as using scripts to add friends or send comments or messages; interfering with, disrupting, or creating an undue burden on the Mormon Hub Services or the networks or services connected to the Mormon Hub Services; attempting to impersonate another Member or person; copying the code for your Mormon Hub Player and embedding it into other profiles or asking other Members to embed it into their profiles; using the account, username, or password of another Member at any time or disclosing your password to any third party or permitting any third party to access your account; selling or otherwise transferring your profile; using any information obtained from the Mormon Hub Services in order to harass, abuse, or harm another person; displaying an advertisement on your profile, or accepting payment or anything of value from a third person in exchange for your performing any commercial activity on or through the Mormon Hub Services on behalf of that person, such as placing commercial content on your profile, posting blogs or bulletins with a commercial purpose, selecting a profile with a commercial purpose as one of your "Top" friends, or sending private messages with a commercial purpose; or using the Mormon Hub Services in a manner inconsistent with any and all applicable laws and regulations.   8. Copyright Policy. You may not post, modify, distribute, or reproduce in any way any copyrighted material, trademarks, or other proprietary information belonging to others without obtaining the prior written consent of the owner of such proprietary rights. It is the policy of Mormon Hub to terminate Membership privileges of any Member who repeatedly infringes the copyright rights of others upon receipt of proper notification to Mormon Hub by the copyright owner or the copyright owner's legal agent. Without limiting the foregoing, if you believe that your work has been copied and posted on the Mormon Hub Services in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please provide our Copyright Agent with the following information: (i) an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; (ii) a description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed; (iii) a description of where the material that you claim is infringing is located on the Mormon Hub Services; (iv) your address, telephone number, and email address; (v) a written statement by you that you have a good faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (vi) a statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf. 9. Member Disputes. You are solely responsible for your interactions with other Mormon Hub Members. Mormon Hub reserves the right, but has no obligation, to monitor disputes between you and other Members. 10. Privacy. Use of the Mormon Hub Services is also governed by our Privacy Policy, which is incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. 11. Disclaimers. Mormon Hub is not responsible for any incorrect or inaccurate Content posted on the Mormon Hub Website or in connection with the Mormon Hub Services, whether caused by Users of the Mormon Hub Services or by any of the equipment or programming associated with or utilized in the Mormon Hub Services. Profiles created and posted by Members on the Mormon Hub Website may contain links to other websites. Mormon Hub is not responsible for the Content, accuracy or opinions expressed on such websites, and such websites are in no way investigated, monitored or checked for accuracy or completeness by Mormon Hub. Inclusion of any linked website on the Mormon Hub Services does not imply approval or endorsement of the linked website by Mormon Hub. When you access these third-party sites, you do so at your own risk. Mormon Hub takes no responsibility for third party advertisements which are posted on this Mormon Hub Website or through the Mormon Hub Services, nor does it take any responsibility for the goods or services provided by its advertisers. Mormon Hub is not responsible for the conduct, whether online or offline, of any User of the Mormon Hub Services.Mormon Hub assumes no responsibility for any error, omission, interruption, deletion, defect, delay in operation or transmission, communications line failure, theft or destruction or unauthorized access to, or alteration of, any User or Member communication. Mormon Hub is not responsible for any problems or technical malfunction of any telephone network or lines, computer online systems, servers or providers, computer equipment, software, failure of any email or players due to technical problems or traffic congestion on the Internet or on any of the Mormon Hub Services or combination thereof, including any injury or damage to Users or to any person's computer related to or resulting from participation or downloading materials in connection with the Mormon Hub Services. Under no circumstances shall Mormon Hub be responsible for any loss or damage, including personal injury or death, resulting from use of the Mormon Hub Services, attendance at a Mormon Hub event, from any Content posted on or through the Mormon Hub Services, or from the conduct of any Users of the Mormon Hub Services, whether online or offline. The Mormon Hub Services are provided "AS-IS" and as available and Mormon Hub expressly disclaims any warranty of fitness for a particular purpose or non-infringement. Mormon Hub cannot guarantee and does not promise any specific results from use of the Mormon Hub Services. 12. Limitation on Liability. IN NO EVENT SHALL MORMON HUB BE LIABLE TO YOU OR ANY THIRD PARTY FOR ANY INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, EXEMPLARY, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, INCLUDING LOST PROFIT DAMAGES ARISING FROM YOUR USE OF THE SERVICES, EVEN IF MORMON HUB HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY CONTAINED HEREIN, MORMON HUB'S LIABILITY TO YOU FOR ANY CAUSE WHATSOEVER AND REGARDLESS OF THE FORM OF THE ACTION, WILL AT ALL TIMES BE LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID, IF ANY, BY YOU TO MORMON HUB FOR THE MORMON HUB SERVICES DURING THE TERM OF MEMBERSHIP. 13. U.S. Export Controls. Software available in connection with the Mormon Hub Services (the "Software") is further subject to United States export controls. No Software may be downloaded from the Mormon Hub Services or otherwise exported or re-exported in violation of U.S. export laws. Downloading or using the Software is at your sole risk. 14. Disputes. If there is any dispute about or involving the Mormon Hub Services, you agree that the dispute shall be governed by the laws of the State of Utah, USA, without regard to conflict of law provisions and you agree to exclusive personal jurisdiction and venue in the state and federal courts of the United States located in the State of Utah, City of Orem. Either Mormon Hub or you may demand that any dispute between Mormon Hub and you about or involving the Mormon Hub Services must be settled by arbitration utilizing the dispute resolution procedures of the American Arbitration Association (AAA) in Orem, Utah, USA, provided that the foregoing shall not prevent Mormon Hub from seeking injunctive relief in a court of competent jurisdiction. 15. Indemnity. You agree to indemnify and hold Mormon Hub, its subsidiaries, and affiliates, and their respective officers, agents, partners and employees, harmless from any loss, liability, claim, or demand, including reasonable attorneys' fees, made by any third party due to or arising out of your use of the Mormon Hub Services in violation of this Agreement and/or arising from a breach of this Agreement and/or any breach of your representations and warranties set forth above and/or if any Content that you post on theMormon Hub Website or through the Mormon Hub Services causes Mormon Hub to be liable to another. 16. Other. This Agreement is accepted upon your use of the Mormon Hub Website or any of the Mormon Hub Services and is further affirmed by you becoming a Member. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between you and Mormon Hub regarding the use of the Mormon Hub Services. The failure of Mormon Hub to exercise or enforce any right or provision of this Agreement shall not operate as a waiver of such right or provision. The section titles in this Agreement are for convenience only and have no legal or contractual effect. Mormon Hub is a trademark of Mormon Hub, Inc. This Agreement operates to the fullest extent permissible by law. If any provision of this Agreement is unlawful, void or unenforceable, that provision is deemed severable from this Agreement and does not affect the validity and enforceability of any remaining provisions. Please contact us at: Contact Mormon Hub with any questions regarding this Agreement.   Use the online HTML tidy to compose similar articles in your web browser.
    • rpframe

      IMPORTANT!! -- Login Issues   09/12/17

      TL;DR; In order to fix login issues, a lot of people will have to reset their password. As of now, if you are unable to login, please attempt a "Forgot Password"/"Password Reset" (check your spam folder) and if that doesn't work then feel free to Contact Us, for help and please check back on this post for any status updates and FAQs as we go through this process. FAQ:
      [Reserved Space]
      Firstly, I'd like to apologize on behalf of MormonHub for the frustration of the login system. There is a lot of cool things we could do with the login system, and having the logins synced up between our forum system and our front end system has been nice, but for multiple reasons (not just the current login issues), we have decided to move back to the earlier login system. While I would love to be able to migrate everyone's current passwords back, but the systems are just not compatible that way. So a large number of users will need to do a password reset. We realize that we forced everyone to do this on the move to the new system, and we sincerely apologize to everyone that will have to do it again. The Login System has now been swapped over. Give us a little bit of time to work out kinks in the system (will post updates here). If you are unable to login anymore, then please perform a password reset (check spam folder) and if that fails and we don't have any acknowledgement of problems on this post (No known problems at this time), then feel free to contact us (keeping in mind that there are a lot of you and very few of us).
Traveler

Faith, understanding and truth.

Recommended Posts

 

Perhaps I may be wrong but it often seems to me that in general everybody has faith and trust in empirical evidence that they will amend their understanding of something when there is empirical evidence.  That is with two possible exceptions – religion and politics.  But I would address what often seem to me to be to be a great paradox or enigma of faith within the religious community.

That many believe it to be a tenet of religious faith – that is to hold to a doctrine despite a preponderance of empirical evidence that what is understood of the doctrine is either not accurate or completely false.  Many a religious person has expressed to me that they believe G-d is testing them.  Is this possible – that G-d would deceive us as a means of testing us?  Do we really believe a G-d of “TRUTH” does or would do such a thing?

For the record – I believe G-d to be good and truthful – IN ALL THINGS!!!  I do not believe that G-d will or can lie and remain G-d.  I also believe G-d to be the creator and architect of all things empirical.  Since all empirical things are under his control – I believe that if empirical evidence contradicts doctrine.  That either the doctrine is false – or we do not understand the doctrine correctly.  There is one other possibility and that is that we are not observing correctly.  But then there is another problem.  That if we are not observing empirical things correctly why do we believe we understand spiritual things better?

I do not believe that the truth of science and the truth of religion has ever – in the entire history of the universe – contradicted or conflicted with each other.  I do not believe a G-d of truth has ever created anything with the intent to deceive or even confuse us.

 

The Traveler

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Traveler said:

 

Perhaps I may be wrong but it often seems to me that in general everybody has faith and trust in empirical evidence that they will amend their understanding of something when there is empirical evidence.  That is with two possible exceptions – religion and politics.  But I would address what often seem to me to be to be a great paradox or enigma of faith within the religious community.

That many believe it to be a tenet of religious faith – that is to hold to a doctrine despite a preponderance of empirical evidence that what is understood of the doctrine is either not accurate or completely false.  Many a religious person has expressed to me that they believe G-d is testing them.  Is this possible – that G-d would deceive us as a means of testing us?  Do we really believe a G-d of “TRUTH” does or would do such a thing?

For the record – I believe G-d to be good and truthful – IN ALL THINGS!!!  I do not believe that G-d will or can lie and remain G-d.  I also believe G-d to be the creator and architect of all things empirical.  Since all empirical things are under his control – I believe that if empirical evidence contradicts doctrine.  That either the doctrine is false – or we do not understand the doctrine correctly.  There is one other possibility and that is that we are not observing correctly.  But then there is another problem.  That if we are not observing empirical things correctly why do we believe we understand spiritual things better?

I do not believe that the truth of science and the truth of religion has ever – in the entire history of the universe – contradicted or conflicted with each other.  I do not believe a G-d of truth has ever created anything with the intent to deceive or even confuse us.

 

The Traveler

I agree that God does not lie or seek to deceive us. As for empirical evidence goes, its a subjective term that can at times mean just an idea or theory with no real proof. For instance- empirical proof that humans evolved from a lower order of species is in fact a deceitful statement. Empirical truth means that it has been proven by testing and observation. The theory of human evolution fails such criteria to be defined as "empirical" as it has never been observed and tested to show a human transforming from a lower species into a higher species.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An interesting question, Traveler. I don't think I know the answer. I am reminded of a discussion I started years ago on 1 Kings chapter 13

In short, God commanded one prophet not to eat while in a foreign country, then, according to the JST, God commanded a second prophet to tempt/test the first one to break the first commandment. When the first prophet broke the first commanded, he was reprimanded and killed. Did God really command the temptation/testing in this manner, or is the JST incorrect in this case? The other thread (and other apologetics sites I have seen on the question of God tempting man) suggests a difference between "test" and "tempt", though I am not sure I am sold on the semantic difference. Does God put information/situations/etc. in front of us that He knows will challenge us or tempt us or test us?

For my part, I don't really know. It seems to me that God might put misinformation in front of us (or allow misinformation to be put in front of us) as a test to see if we will remain faithful.

How this applies to questions of science and creation and evolution and cosomology and empiricism and such, I really don't know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe this is a concept that @wenglund was sharing regarding perceptions and his thoughts pertaining to "firm" faith that inhibits growth, or causes a loss of faith (he can correct me if I understood him incorrectly). Empirical evidence, at least for me, needs to be "common" and cannot stray into the realm of "philosophy" for the given evidence to have any change in my current belief system. Empirical evidence that is common is evidence that everyone can easily identify and accept. Example, everyone (even a child) can drop a ball and see that the ball falls, thus something is acting upon the ball. This is common.

Promulgated empirical evidence will cause me to rethink my current belief systems as long as the information is "common." Example, global warming, is not common and strays into the realm of "philosophy," and yet, it is being driven so hard by certain proponents with pseudo evidence (having the appearance of but is not sufficient for everyone to say, yep global warming is a concern).

God is a God of truth and cannot lie, thus we agree, in all things God is a God of truth (otherwise there would be a shadow of changing and he would cease to be God). I do love the notion given, "all empirical things are under his control," and that the given options definitely are reasons for individuals to reject empirical evidence:

1) We have not understood true doctrine (looking beyond the mark is one way that doctrine is not understood)
2) Doctrine accepted is false
3) Our understanding of the empirical evidence is incorrect (similar to #1 with doctrine as we do not have the whole picture)
4) Empirical evidence is false (based on faulty suppositions)

The last paragraph I agree 100% with.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Traveler said:

Perhaps I may be wrong but it often seems to me that in general everybody has faith and trust in empirical evidence that they will amend their understanding of something when there is empirical evidence.  That is with two possible exceptions – religion and politics. 

I would agree if you had said "some" or even "many" will amend their understanding when there is empirical evidence, but many others will hold to their beliefs and opinions without regard to evidence even unto death, and it doesn't have to be just religion and politics. 

Quote

But I would address what often seem to me to be to be a great paradox or enigma of faith within the religious community.

That many believe it to be a tenet of religious faith – that is to hold to a doctrine despite a preponderance of empirical evidence that what is understood of the doctrine is either not accurate or completely false.  Many a religious person has expressed to me that they believe G-d is testing them.  Is this possible – that G-d would deceive us as a means of testing us?  Do we really believe a G-d of “TRUTH” does or would do such a thing?

I am interested in talking more with you about why you find it mysterious that some people would behave as you describe. After all, my friend, religion is not empirical. By it's nature it is a matter of raising one's beliefs to the same level as evidence, or at least calling them evidence. Religion on this particular planet has pretty much been about believing because someone in a position of authority said to believe. History is replete with examples. 

Quote

Many a religious person has expressed to me that they believe G-d is testing them.  Is this possible – that G-d would deceive us as a means of testing us?  Do we really believe a G-d of “TRUTH” does or would do such a thing?

For the record – I believe G-d to be good and truthful – IN ALL THINGS!!!  I do not believe that G-d will or can lie and remain G-d.  I also believe G-d to be the creator and architect of all things empirical.  Since all empirical things are under his control – I believe that if empirical evidence contradicts doctrine.  That either the doctrine is false – or we do not understand the doctrine correctly.  There is one other possibility and that is that we are not observing correctly.  But then there is another problem.  That if we are not observing empirical things correctly why do we believe we understand spiritual things better?

I do not believe that the truth of science and the truth of religion has ever – in the entire history of the universe – contradicted or conflicted with each other.  I do not believe a G-d of truth has ever created anything with the intent to deceive or even confuse us.

Let's stipulate that (just about anyone's) God is by definition higher than me in every respect. While it is reasonable for people to try to understand God, Is it unreasonable for most to ascribe motives like testing? (The scriptures don't seem to indicate that it is unreasonable).  Moreover I would answer your question regarding observation and understanding by referring to scientific endeavors themselves throughout history. It is a hallmark of science that conclusions be drawn from observations (and experimentation of course) and later on revised because further observation reveals that the hypotheses didn't take everything in to account for the evidence. In short, we will always see through a glass darkly as far as science is concerned--in that manner it is not completely dissimilar to religion. And God (with religion) doesn't appear to be obligated to reveal everything we'd like when we would like it. Let's talk more. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Anddenex said:

 ... Empirical evidence, at least for me, needs to be "common" and cannot stray into the realm of "philosophy" for the given evidence to have any change in my current belief system. Empirical evidence that is common is evidence that everyone can easily identify and accept. Example, everyone (even a child) can drop a ball and see that the ball falls, thus something is acting upon the ball. This is common.

Promulgated empirical evidence will cause me to rethink my current belief systems as long as the information is "common." Example, global warming, is not common and strays into the realm of "philosophy," and yet, it is being driven so hard by certain proponents with pseudo evidence (having the appearance of but is not sufficient for everyone to say, yep global warming is a concern).

I hope you won't judge me as being impertinent, but only interested in discussion and striving to examine every part of the elephant so to speak. In that spirit I feel almost compelled to stand for a minute or two next to some of my flat-Earth friends (with whom I do *not* agree by the way but do empathize). Some people who preach from the pulpit of Science will claim common empirical evidence that they have never experienced for themselves and in reality are utterly incapable of experiencing or replicating--although they won't always confess that reality. Some of these same people will fight to the death denying that they accept the scientific explanations on anything like faith. 

Edited by Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Mike said:

I hope you won't judge me as being impertinent, but only interested in discussion and striving to examine every part of the elephant so to speak. In that spirit I feel almost compelled to stand for a minute or two next to some of my flat-Earth friends (with whom I do *not* agree by the way but do empathize). Some people who preach from the pulpit of Science will claim common empirical evidence that they have never experienced for themselves and in reality are utterly incapable of experiencing or replicating--although they won't always confess that reality. Some of these same people will fight to the death denying that they accept the scientific explanations on anything like faith. 

Nothing impertinent. If flat-Earth friends are unwilling to accept pictures (viewing pictures within the realm of philosophy) of a spherical earth, then this is what they believe. What part of the elephant are you seeking to examine?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Anddenex said:

Nothing impertinent. If flat-Earth friends are unwilling to accept pictures (viewing pictures within the realm of philosophy) of a spherical earth, then this is what they believe. What part of the elephant are you seeking to examine?

That's part of my point. They are *not* willing to accept pictures. You and I can say that's unreasonable of them, because you and I do accept the pictures. But they have their reasons--which to them are valid reasons. Oh, and the elephant? Well, you see I'm blind (so to speak) so I want to touch every last part, especially the parts the other blind guys have been touching and describing--if you get my drift. :)

Just to elaborate a bit. We, as Americans, are secure in our convictions that the U.S.S.R. employed elaborate (although at times clumsy) techniques to falsify photographs to convince the masses of this or that claim. That being the case, and we having access to far more effective techniques today, oh and of course knowing that we "can't trust the Feds", it's shouldn't be difficult to understand my flat-Earth friends' rejection of pictures of a circle with clouds painted on it as evidence we live on a sphere. I (and probably you, too) don't have access to what I need to replicate (all of) the astronauts' experiments and thereby validate their claims of what Earth really looks like from the Moon, etc, for the sake of gathering common empirical evidence. So, I freely confess that I'm not as empirical as I'd like to believe--I take an awful lot on faith and appeal to authority.

 

Edited by Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

There may be a misunderstand with what I mean by empirical evidence.  I will reference the following definition: 

em·pir·i·cal

əmˈpirik(ə)l/

adjective

adjective: empirical

1.    based on, concerned with, or verifiable by observation or experience rather than theory or pure logic.

"they provided considerable empirical evidence to support their argument"

 

I admit that mostly we think of the physical in terms of empirical.  But what it means is that there is a measurable way to determine or observe what is happening.  Empirical evidence can be either direct or indirect as the path of an electron in a “cloud” chamber.  Another example could be subtle clues measured by various “lie” detectors.   The point being that the process is repeatable and observable or measurable. 

Certain wave lengths of light would not be empirical evidence anciently but would be with the inclusion of modern ways of measuring and detecting various wave lengths of light.   I speculate that all things are empirical (including spiritual things) if we knew how to observe and measure such things.

Please let me introduce some other thought concerning empirical evidence.  Things empirical are also consistent.  What is observed at one time concerning empirical will be consistent whenever the same is observed.   In the religious community we claim that G-d is consistent but what is consistent is not well defined.  This cause a lot of discussion in the religious community about such ideas as “bad” things happening to “good” people.  

I am sometimes confused by claims of consistency (empirical) in the religious community that are inconsistent.  Often the responding argument is made that G-d thinks (or sees things) differently than we do.  I often interpret such arguments as that the person trying to respond with such argument - really does not understand G-d nor what is going on.

On this thread, some have referenced the theory of evolution – as though such theory has unmeasurables and inconsistencies.   I am inclined to believe that those that argue against the theory of evolution do not understand the theory very well (have not studied the theory in much depth) and that their responses lack measurables and consistencies.   Rather the inconsistencies are more imagined and misplaced than real.  For those that are sure that evolution does not play a part in creation – I would be most interested in what you are measuring and what you consider inconsistence.   I would also like to know what you think about the observable problem of pre-historic Neanderthal DNA appearing in certain human populations?

Anyway, some thoughts

 

The Traveler

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Traveler Isn't it true that for a given (thing) to be observable you and I must be able to observe it with use of the same senses either simultaneously or under identical conditions? You are not entitled to claim (to me) that you empirically observed "X" if I don't obtain the same results according to the conditions you say existed and with the same senses you say you utilized, are you?

Edited by Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Traveler said:

adjective: empirical

1.    based on, concerned with, or verifiable by observation or experience rather than theory or pure logic.

"they provided considerable empirical evidence to support their argument"

If the scientific realm held to this definition, a lot of what is considered "fact", would not be considered fact. In my youth, our texts book proclaimed that different species could not mate with each other. If you argued otherwise, you were wrong. These text books were written by informed, knowledgeable, people in their field. As further knowledge was given, well, different species are able to mate and have offspring (or at least what modern scientist define as different species).

I was hoping to find the youtube video regarding a theory that lasted 100 years until one researcher asked the "right" question, and 100 years of belief was changed. Anyone who argued against all the studies, what many people promulgate as "empirical" evidence, were considered uninformed (people who truly didn't study the topic). What I found interesting in college is how easily research studies, published research studies, could be used to give evidence for two different -- competing -- theories. Our teacher presented one argument, which we would be in favor of, and the given evidence -- empirical -- and then had us read the same article but from the perspective of one who was a proponent of its competing theory.

The claim of God seeing our whole experience differently than we do is found in this scripture: Isaiah 55:8-9. The Lord instructs us that his ways are higher than our ways and his thoughts higher than our thoughts. This implies that God is able to see more clearly things we have not, or he sees things differently than we do. As a father, my knowledge is greater than my children and I am able to see clearly aspects they are still blind to.

Revealed doctrine is a greater than any "empirical" knowledge a human scientist can provide, especially if the "empirical" evidence is subject to a theory. Example, what does popular science determine the geography of land of Egypt before it was settled by the Egyptians? What does the Pearl of Great Price suggest the geography was in relation to it being settled by the Egyptians? Unless, similar to mating different species, there has been a change we will see conflict between revealed truth and scientific theory. We agree previously that science and religion do not contradict, and yet we have a contradiction.

Evolution from a sea creature to land creature has never been observed, nor can it be verified or replicated. Thus, the given definition of empirical cannot apply to "evolution" as a whole as it can not be observed and thus far has never been observed regarding the full change of one species into a completely different offspring (fish creatures to an amphibian type creature). It is solely based on theory according to what now exists. Evidence they give, or could be like, is the mud skipper. A creature that exists, and has not changed and continues to produce mud skippers, at least to me, isn't good empirical evidence to support evolution, but many prominent scientist will use the mud skipper as an example - a possibility (key word possibility)  Now, I agree with evolution within kinds, example, trout have many different species which probably stemmed from the same species. The kicker, they are still trout -- fish. Rainbow fish which you can't keep because they have red slashes like the cut throat. This is observable. We can see a change in alleles from parent and offspring. My son does not look like me and is not a clone of me.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/20/2017 at 11:56 AM, Traveler said:

I do not believe that the truth of science and the truth of religion has ever – in the entire history of the universe – contradicted or conflicted with each other.  I do not believe a G-d of truth has ever created anything with the intent to deceive or even confuse us.

What is science?  The physical sciences only or are there other things you would consider "science.?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

There are many things to consider about observation.  Recently I was at an intersection waiting for a light to change.  As the light changed an accident occurred in the intersection.  There were 3 additional individuals sitting with me in the car and as each expressed what was their observation, there was wild variations from when the light changed to even the initial directions the cars involved in the accident were traveling.  

I tended to believe my own observations were the most accurate because I was driving and thus paying more attention.  In addition, I recalculated in my mind the forces involved to validate where the cars ended up.  I was surprised that as I explained my validations that some in my car still held to their version of things – even though their opinions contradicted the positions of the cars at the end of the accident.  One individual held to their opinion despite the “fact” that there was no damage to either car where they thought they initially collided.

I believe rivals sitting at sporting events will “observe” differently.  Bias plays an important role.  Often the expression – keeping an open mind is very important.  I believe this notion is even mentioned in scripture and is considered as being teachable.  The question is – How teachable are we?

The theory of evolution is the theory of change and is the principle of documentation of observable changes and then an attempt to explain the causes of the changes.  But if readers would allow (have an open mind) may I propose a thought about evolution and the theory of evolution?

In essence, the theory of evolution claims that all the changes in creatures of this planet can be explained by principles and laws of known and observable things that take place around us day by day.  Some in the scientific community have suggested that we do not need a supernatural G-d creating the universe and life.  All the things we observe happening can be explained by natural things that go on around us every moment of every day.  Nothing extraordinary or “unnatural” needs to occur to explain creation and life.  Can someone explain why this should upset anyone that believes in G-d?  Why would G-d change his methods and ways of creating us (current man) from the ways and methods he used to create Adam and Eve?  Where is there even a hint of such radical changes in G-d’s methods in any revelations – ancient or modern?  Does something have to be unexplainable and fantastic (supernatural) to be miraculous and from G-d?  I submit that even if there is what some think is an example – that it is not an actual doctrine every taught by G-d.

The author of “2001: A Space Odyssey”, Arthur C. Clarke once said that any sufficiently advanced technology will appear or seem supernatural. 

Two principles I believe to be true:

#1.  The more truth we learn the better we will understand G-d.

#2.  There is no truth nor pursuit of truth that any believer in G-d need fear or think contradicts G-d, his purposes, intents or accomplishments.

 

The Traveler

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/22/2017 at 10:17 AM, Traveler said:

Two principles I believe to be true:

#1.  The more truth we learn the better we will understand G-d.

#2.  There is no truth nor pursuit of truth that any believer in G-d need fear or think contradicts G-d, his purposes, intents or accomplishments.

We completely agree with the following principles. God is truth. We draw closer to God by accepting revealed truth, temporal and spiritual.

On 2/22/2017 at 10:17 AM, Traveler said:

In essence, the theory of evolution claims that all the changes in creatures of this planet can be explained by principles and laws of known and observable things that take place around us day by day.  Some in the scientific community have suggested that we do not need a supernatural G-d creating the universe and life.  All the things we observe happening can be explained by natural things that go on around us every moment of every day.  Nothing extraordinary or “unnatural” needs to occur to explain creation and life.  Can someone explain why this should upset anyone that believes in G-d?  Why would G-d change his methods and ways of creating us (current man) from the ways and methods he used to create Adam and Eve?  Where is there even a hint of such radical changes in G-d’s methods in any revelations – ancient or modern?  Does something have to be unexplainable and fantastic (supernatural) to be miraculous and from G-d?  I submit that even if there is what some think is an example – that it is not an actual doctrine every taught by G-d.

Can someone explain why this should upset anyone that believes in G-d? The notion of God working through natural laws shouldn't upset anyone that believes in God. I have heard it often said that what we call miracles are celestial laws we are at this moment unaware of. I find these statements to be true. We call them miracles because we are not yet able to explain their natural course; however, there appear to be outlying principles/laws that require the command of a God (e.g. Lazarus who was dead for four days and then risen, not resurrected). The upsetting factor, at least to my knowledge, is individuals who will specify "Due to natural observations their is no God" and use natural laws to persuade God fearing people that they are wrong. Evolution is a theory that some proponents use to bash theists, so naturally, there is going to be back lash.

Why would G-d change his methods and ways of creating us (current man) from the ways and methods he used to create Adam and Eve? This is double-edged question. Is God able to create Adam & Eve without evolution. The answer is yes. This doesn't change the method of how God created Adam & Eve and how we were born. Adam & Eve were in an immortal state. Current humans are not. Is God able to organize matter to create an immortal body, yes. Now, if Adam & Eve were immortal (but are products of evolution) how then were their parents -- immortal (as some suggest Adam & Eve were offspring of evolution)? This question then creates a conundrum, a quandary, of sorts.

Where is there even a hint of such radical changes in G-d’s methods in any revelations – ancient or modern? Ancient and modern revelation confirms that God created Adam & Eve as first man, first woman. They were in a state of immortality. The record currently dictates that there was no death (a conundrum according to science observations and records). Now, here is where we entertain the doctrine and principle taught in Doctrine and Covenants 1: 37-38 where we are given a definition of scripture, or God's words. In 1909 and published again for modern readers, we are given a proclamation from those with priesthood keys, authority, and stewardship regarding the origin of Adam and Eve. In this case, ancient and modern revelation continue to promulgate that Adam & Eve were created by God. They were in a state of immortality when created. The concept of them not evolving from a lower order of species has also been declared. Truth though is most important, and when revealed if we want to draw closer to God (principle #1) then we will accept truth. As for me, the theory of evolution doesn't change my belief in God.

Does something have to be unexplainable and fantastic (supernatural) to be miraculous and from G-d? No, not at all.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Despite more than two centuries of philosophic inquiry, I don't believe the questions raised by David Hume about causality, the nature of evidence, and the reliability of conclusions that are drawn from observation, have been adequately answered. 

I think that until these questions have been adequately answered, we cannot rely 100% on evidence based conclusions - maybe 99% if one is extremely optimistic and somewhat irrational, but certainly not 100%. Anybody who does place a high reliance on physical evidence is demonstrating a high degree of faith in an imperfect and inadequately explained system of empiricism and scientific method. When once places a complete trust, rather than a limited trust in science, I am reminded of 2 Kings 18:21 Now, behold, thou trustest upon the staff of this bruised reed, even upon Egypt (science) on which if a man lean, it will go into his hand, and pierce it: 

From wikipedia under the entry on David Hume

In what is sometimes referred to as Hume's problem of induction, he argued that inductive reasoning, and belief in causality, cannot, ultimately, be justified rationally; our trust in causality and induction instead results from custom and mental habit, and are attributable to only the experience of "constant conjunction" rather than logic: for we can never, in experience, perceive that one event causes another, but only that the two are always conjoined, and to draw any inductive causal inferences from past experience first requires the presupposition that the future will be like the past, a presupposition which cannot be grounded in prior experience without already being presupposed.[5] 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Anddenex said:

Why would G-d change his methods and ways of creating us (current man) from the ways and methods he used to create Adam and Eve? This is double-edged question. Is God able to create Adam & Eve without evolution. The answer is yes. This doesn't change the method of how God created Adam & Eve and how we were born. Adam & Eve were in an immortal state. Current humans are not. Is God able to organize matter to create an immortal body, yes. Now, if Adam & Eve were immortal (but are products of evolution) how then were their parents -- immortal (as some suggest Adam & Eve were offspring of evolution)? This question then creates a conundrum, a quandary, of sorts.

Where is there even a hint of such radical changes in G-d’s methods in any revelations – ancient or modern? Ancient and modern revelation confirms that God created Adam & Eve as first man, first woman. They were in a state of immortality. The record currently dictates that there was no death (a conundrum according to science observations and records). Now, here is where we entertain the doctrine and principle taught in Doctrine and Covenants 1: 37-38 where we are given a definition of scripture, or God's words. In 1909 and published again for modern readers, we are given a proclamation from those with priesthood keys, authority, and stewardship regarding the origin of Adam and Eve. In this case, ancient and modern revelation continue to promulgate that Adam & Eve were created by God. They were in a state of immortality when created. The concept of them not evolving from a lower order of species has also been declared. Truth though is most important, and when revealed if we want to draw closer to God (principle #1) then we will accept truth. As for me, the theory of evolution doesn't change my belief in God.

 

A thought – the scriptures tell us that G-d created man.  The note that I would emphasize is that the scriptures refer to the creation of “Man” and not just Adam and Eve.  We learn from the Pearl of Great Price that all things were created “spiritually” before they were created naturally.  The notion of spiritual creation is very interesting.  All of the spiritual creation was created perfect and immortal.  I would point out that there are some small human populations, alive today, that have lower Neanderthal species DNA.

Was Adam the “first” man.  I would point out that the Hebrew word for first is not of necessity chronological.  Its primary meaning was most noble or highest class.  For example, the first born of Egypt were not the oldest individuals in a family but the most noble class – those that were considered the “rulers” of Egypt.  I suggest that with this interpretation it is possible that Adam was the first man even though there were older humans “types” or what science would classify as modern man.

Again. I am not in authority to say this or that is the answer – but in my personal efforts (study, meditation and prayer) I see possibility that things may not be exactly as some think it to so be.

 

The Traveler

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/25/2017 at 10:07 PM, askandanswer said:

I thought that the topic of evolution has been almost done to death on this forum. Do we need to discuss it some more?

Nah.  You know where it's gonna lead.  But you know what's fun to talk about?  Do you know that we are only taking it by faith that Mozart, in fact, composed the Magic Flute, and that we actually have no idea how it actually sounded when Mozart played it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, anatess2 said:

Nah.  You know where it's gonna lead.  But you know what's fun to talk about?  Do you know that we are only taking it by faith that Mozart, in fact, composed the Magic Flute, and that we actually have no idea how it actually sounded when Mozart played it?

I haven't had a close look at the question of whether Wolfgang Mozart composed the Magic Flute, but I would suspect there's a fair bit of evidence around to support the idea that he was in fact the composer. Who knows, there might even be somewhere the document that commissioned Mozart to write it. As to how it sounded, I'm guessing it was...... magical.

I don't know for sure but I think its reasonably likely that the Academy of Ancient Music has probably performed the Magic Flute, using either original instruments of Mozart's time or replicas, and if the Academy followed its usual practice, they would have done a lot of research to ensure that the score they played was either an original of a very close copy

http://www.aam.co.uk/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, askandanswer said:

I haven't had a close look at the question of whether Wolfgang Mozart composed the Magic Flute, but I would suspect there's a fair bit of evidence around to support the idea that he was in fact the composer. Who knows, there might even be somewhere the document that commissioned Mozart to write it. As to how it sounded, I'm guessing it was...... magical.

I don't know for sure but I think its reasonably likely that the Academy of Ancient Music has probably performed the Magic Flute, using either original instruments of Mozart's time or replicas, and if the Academy followed its usual practice, they would have done a lot of research to ensure that the score they played was either an original of a very close copy

http://www.aam.co.uk/

Right... but nobody we know ever heard Mozart play and there's no evidence of Mozart playing... so, do we really know?  For all we know, it's just some folks who want to adhere to the philosophy that Mozart composed the Magic Flute and it sounds like however they want you to believe it sounds like...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/20/2017 at 11:56 AM, Traveler said:

 

Perhaps I may be wrong but it often seems to me that in general everybody has faith and trust in empirical evidence that they will amend their understanding of something when there is empirical evidence.  That is with two possible exceptions – religion and politics.  But I would address what often seem to me to be to be a great paradox or enigma of faith within the religious community.

That many believe it to be a tenet of religious faith – that is to hold to a doctrine despite a preponderance of empirical evidence that what is understood of the doctrine is either not accurate or completely false.  Many a religious person has expressed to me that they believe G-d is testing them.  Is this possible – that G-d would deceive us as a means of testing us?  Do we really believe a G-d of “TRUTH” does or would do such a thing?

For the record – I believe G-d to be good and truthful – IN ALL THINGS!!!  I do not believe that G-d will or can lie and remain G-d.  I also believe G-d to be the creator and architect of all things empirical.  Since all empirical things are under his control – I believe that if empirical evidence contradicts doctrine.  That either the doctrine is false – or we do not understand the doctrine correctly.  There is one other possibility and that is that we are not observing correctly.  But then there is another problem.  That if we are not observing empirical things correctly why do we believe we understand spiritual things better?

I do not believe that the truth of science and the truth of religion has ever – in the entire history of the universe – contradicted or conflicted with each other.  I do not believe a G-d of truth has ever created anything with the intent to deceive or even confuse us.

 

The Traveler

The one "wrench in the works" is the fact that what is observed empirically are observations of a corrupt fallen world. In fact, even our minds are corrupt, so what we take in as empirical can easily be corrupted interpretations or observations.  Elder Bednar said, " But we presently live in a fallen world. The very elements out of which our bodies were created are by nature fallen and ever subject to the pull of sin, corruption, and death. Consequently, the Fall of Adam and its spiritual and temporal consequences affect us most directly through our physical bodies. "

God allowed for opposition which is what is meant by "in the flesh". Do you not believe that this world is created by the Fall? The "architect" of this current world, for a short time, is the Fall of Adam which was brought about by a lie and the father of all lies. The contradictions and conflictions are to create opposition.  2 Nephi 2  18  Wherefore, he said unto Eve, yea, even that old serpent, who is the devil, who is the father of all lies, wherefore he said: Partake of the forbidden fruit, and ye shall not die, but ye shall be as God, knowing good and evil.  ...  27 Wherefore, men are free according to the flesh; and all things are given them which are expedient unto man. And they are free to choose liberty and eternal life, through the great Mediator of all men, or to choose captivity and death, according to the captivity and power of the devil; for he seeketh that all men might be miserable like unto himself. ...  29 And not choose eternal death, according to the will of the flesh and the evil which is therein, which giveth the spirit of the devil power to captivate, to bring you down to hell, that he may reign over you in his own kingdom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/22/2017 at 10:17 AM, Traveler said:

 

There are many things to consider about observation.  Recently I was at an intersection waiting for a light to change.  As the light changed an accident occurred in the intersection.  There were 3 additional individuals sitting with me in the car and as each expressed what was their observation, there was wild variations from when the light changed to even the initial directions the cars involved in the accident were traveling.  

I tended to believe my own observations were the most accurate because I was driving and thus paying more attention.  In addition, I recalculated in my mind the forces involved to validate where the cars ended up.  I was surprised that as I explained my validations that some in my car still held to their version of things – even though their opinions contradicted the positions of the cars at the end of the accident.  One individual held to their opinion despite the “fact” that there was no damage to either car where they thought they initially collided.

I believe rivals sitting at sporting events will “observe” differently.  Bias plays an important role.  Often the expression – keeping an open mind is very important.  I believe this notion is even mentioned in scripture and is considered as being teachable.  The question is – How teachable are we?

The theory of evolution is the theory of change and is the principle of documentation of observable changes and then an attempt to explain the causes of the changes.  But if readers would allow (have an open mind) may I propose a thought about evolution and the theory of evolution?

In essence, the theory of evolution claims that all the changes in creatures of this planet can be explained by principles and laws of known and observable things that take place around us day by day.  Some in the scientific community have suggested that we do not need a supernatural G-d creating the universe and life.  All the things we observe happening can be explained by natural things that go on around us every moment of every day.  Nothing extraordinary or “unnatural” needs to occur to explain creation and life.  Can someone explain why this should upset anyone that believes in G-d?  Why would G-d change his methods and ways of creating us (current man) from the ways and methods he used to create Adam and Eve?  Where is there even a hint of such radical changes in G-d’s methods in any revelations – ancient or modern?  Does something have to be unexplainable and fantastic (supernatural) to be miraculous and from G-d?  I submit that even if there is what some think is an example – that it is not an actual doctrine every taught by G-d.

The author of “2001: A Space Odyssey”, Arthur C. Clarke once said that any sufficiently advanced technology will appear or seem supernatural. 

Two principles I believe to be true:

#1.  The more truth we learn the better we will understand G-d.

#2.  There is no truth nor pursuit of truth that any believer in G-d need fear or think contradicts G-d, his purposes, intents or accomplishments.

 

The Traveler

There are truths that operate in the setting of a corrupted world and then there are truths that are not observable in a corrupted world.  To say that the "truths" of this fallen state could allow us to better understand God is like saying if I had a microscope on a freckle on your skin then I can tell what you look like.  ...unless you think we didn't fall that far or that the veil isn't hiding much of anything.  We are told that we could not comprehend the whole of God's works and when Moses was able to have a glimpse of God's realm and knowledge he stated that he never supposed that man was nothing.  ... that is how we should approach the "truths" of this world. 

Through Christ we can have access to more than what we see here, through faith in Him and His word. Otherwise we are limited to the speck of knowledge we have available here that doesn't even begin to compare to God's truths.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Eydis said:

\Through Christ we can have access to more than what we see here, through faith in Him and His word. Otherwise we are limited to the speck of knowledge we have available here that doesn't even begin to compare to God's truths.

So true! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Eydis said:

There are truths that operate in the setting of a corrupted world and then there are truths that are not observable in a corrupted world.  To say that the "truths" of this fallen state could allow us to better understand God is like saying if I had a microscope on a freckle on your skin then I can tell what you look like.  ...unless you think we didn't fall that far or that the veil isn't hiding much of anything.  We are told that we could not comprehend the whole of God's works and when Moses was able to have a glimpse of God's realm and knowledge he stated that he never supposed that man was nothing.  ... that is how we should approach the "truths" of this world. 

Through Christ we can have access to more than what we see here, through faith in Him and His word. Otherwise we are limited to the speck of knowledge we have available here that doesn't even begin to compare to God's truths.

 

I am not sure that we disagree but rather that we may be seeing the same things through different perspectives.  I believe that the observation of all things (including empirica thingsl) testify of G-d and things that are true.   Of course, there are caveats – The main caveat is that things observed in part can be misunderstood and turned into a lie.  There is a saying that Satan deals with “half” truths or for the purpose of this discussion – partial observations.

I believe that spiritual things (including the influence and gift of the Holy Ghost) help us in seeing and comprehending a more complete picture.  Not that empirical evidences changes but that we understand better what we observe and how all things are related.  It has been my experience that all thing do indeed testify that there is a G-d – I believe this to be true and have yet to discover an exception.  I have also found that without the power of the Holy Ghost it is impossible to know (observe) the truth of anything.

I will give one possible example.  When I was young I was taught and believed that 2 + 2 = 4.  I thought that to always be true.  As I became older and studied number theory (binary operation of addition) in deeper context (deeper context also meant to seek truth through faith and empirical study) I began to better understand number theory as a model for “reality” and realized that the more complete expression was:  2 =< 2 + 2 >= 4     I also was able to understand how such understanding relates to divine creation of things spiritual to adaptation of things physical as expressed in the 3rd chapter of Abraham in the Pearl of Great Price.   I have found my training in the empirical model of mathematics to be a very powerful witness that give evidence and understanding that there is a G-d and "all things" give insite to his attributes.

 

 The Traveler

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/20/2017 at 11:56 AM, Traveler said:

 

Perhaps I may be wrong but it often seems to me that in general everybody has faith and trust in empirical evidence that they will amend their understanding of something when there is empirical evidence.  That is with two possible exceptions – religion and politics.  But I would address what often seem to me to be to be a great paradox or enigma of faith within the religious community.

That many believe it to be a tenet of religious faith – that is to hold to a doctrine despite a preponderance of empirical evidence that what is understood of the doctrine is either not accurate or completely false.  Many a religious person has expressed to me that they believe G-d is testing them.  Is this possible – that G-d would deceive us as a means of testing us?  Do we really believe a G-d of “TRUTH” does or would do such a thing?

For the record – I believe G-d to be good and truthful – IN ALL THINGS!!!  I do not believe that G-d will or can lie and remain G-d.  I also believe G-d to be the creator and architect of all things empirical.  Since all empirical things are under his control – I believe that if empirical evidence contradicts doctrine.  That either the doctrine is false – or we do not understand the doctrine correctly.  There is one other possibility and that is that we are not observing correctly.  But then there is another problem.  That if we are not observing empirical things correctly why do we believe we understand spiritual things better?

I do not believe that the truth of science and the truth of religion has ever – in the entire history of the universe – contradicted or conflicted with each other.  I do not believe a G-d of truth has ever created anything with the intent to deceive or even confuse us.

 

The Traveler

Does the veil qualify as a form of deception under your definition?  The veil keeps us from having the truth - IN ALL THINGS. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now