LDS Church Acquires BoM Printer's Manuscript


Just_A_Guy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Deseret News story at https://www.deseretnews.com/article/865689273/LDS-Church-buys-printers-manuscript-of-Book-of-Mormon-for-record-35-million-from-Community-of.html

Salt Lake Tribune coverage at http://www.sltrib.com/news/2017/09/21/35-million-book-of-mormon-manuscript-sale-to-lds-church-called-the-biggest-game-changer-in-mormon-history/

I don't think either story mentions it, but the driver for this sale is a multi-million dollar shortfall in the CoC's pension funds; which the sale of this manuscript doesn't completely make up.  CoC president Stephen Veazy addressed his church yesterday and announced that the CoC would be looking to divest itself of other historic properties that, in his view, are not core to the church's mission:  http://www.cofchrist.org/common/cms/resources/Documents/20Sept2017-Time-to-Act-EN.pdf

Edited by Just_A_Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be very surprised to see them part with the Kirtland Temple or their portion of the Independence lot.  Barring those, the two major things I can see them selling that the LDS Church might want to buy are the Joseph Smith site in Nauvoo, and the manuscript for the Joseph Smith Translation.

Then again, it will be interesting to see how the rank-and-file CoC membership receives this new policy.

Edited by Just_A_Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Just_A_Guy said:

I don't think either story mentions it, but the driver for this sale is a multi-million dollar shortfall in the CoC's pension funds; which the sale of this manuscript doesn't completely make up.

Thank you!  I was hoping there was some reason beyond historical value for the church to spend such a massive amount on something we already have scanned and digitized.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, NeuroTypical said:

Thank you!  I was hoping there was some reason beyond historical value for the church to spend such a massive amount on something we already have scanned and digitized.  

So you think the Church's purchase of the manuscript was essentially a charity move? Hmmm. Maybe you're right: Do a good deed and get something priceless in return. Win-win, as Stephen Covey might have said.

Given the Church's statement about "donors", it would appear that no tithing money was spent in this acquisition. If the CoC wanted to sell the Kirtland Temple for, say, a billion dollars, I wonder if the Church would pull out the tithing checkbook at that point, or if they would still solicit private funds for the purchase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NeuroTypical said:

Thank you!  I was hoping there was some reason beyond historical value for the church to spend such a massive amount on something we already have scanned and digitized.  

I was wondering if the lds church was worried that a fraudster would buy the original manuscript and make changes? What do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Vort said:

So you think the Church's purchase of the manuscript was essentially a charity move? Hmmm. Maybe you're right: Do a good deed and get something priceless in return. Win-win, as Stephen Covey might have said.

Given the Church's statement about "donors", it would appear that no tithing money was spent in this acquisition. If the CoC wanted to sell the Kirtland Temple for, say, a billion dollars, I wonder if the Church would pull out the tithing checkbook at that point, or if they would still solicit private funds for the purchase.

I'm not sure it makes sense to me to bail out a false religion financially as an act of charity. I mean if it was about people staying alive or losing their livelihood (permanently) or something otherwise, then sure...but to save an aspect of what we believe, ultimately, to be part of the church or the devil?

And....no way on the Kirtland temple (imo)*. But if and when the temple lot in MO comes available by the aptly named (if I recall) Temple Lot church, then I suspect so.

* edit, unless they intended to purchase it, do it up right, dedicate it, and use it as a temple. Then maybe. (Not a billion, obviously...but.......)

Edited by The Folk Prophet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sunday21 said:

I was wondering if the lds church was worried that a fraudster would buy the original manuscript and make changes? What do you think?

It's already been digitized and published so I don't think that is a concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Folk Prophet said:

I'm not sure it makes sense to me to bail out a false religion financially as an act of charity. I mean if it was about people staying alive or losing their livelihood (permanently) or something otherwise, then sure...but to save an aspect of what we believe, ultimately, to be part of the church or the devil?

My understanding from the article  and the letter from the C0C's "prophet/president" was that the proceeds were to go toward the retirement pension fund, which was vastly underfunded.

Moreover, if they have something we want, why wouldn't we pay them fair value for it? I don't think that doing business with another religious institution can reasonably be construed as "bail[ing] out a false religion".

Edited by Vort
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt that the Church would have paid $35 million unless they had reason to believe that someone else might realistically pay $34 million.

The thought of the manuscript going to a private, potentially non-restorationist collector--or worse, being pieced out to hundreds of individual collectors for profit--is perhaps a daunting one; independently of any altruistic motives towards our CoC cousins.

Edited by Just_A_Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Just_A_Guy said:

I doubt that the Church would have paid $35 million unless they had reason to believe that someone else might realistically pay $34 million.

The thought of the manuscript going to a private, potentially non-restorationist collector--or worse, being pieced out to hundreds of individual collectors for profit--is perhaps a daunting one; independently of any altruistic motives towards our CoC cousins.

Nice to think that we have cousins!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/22/2017 at 1:57 AM, Just_A_Guy said:

I just read the Tribune article and it wasn't clear to me what game is being changed, and what the changes might be. Is there any clarification on this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...
On 9/21/2017 at 10:21 AM, Just_A_Guy said:

I would be very surprised to see them part with the Kirtland Temple or their portion of the Independence lot.  Barring those, the two major things I can see them selling that the LDS Church might want to buy are the Joseph Smith site in Nauvoo, and the manuscript for the Joseph Smith Translation.

Then again, it will be interesting to see how the rank-and-file CoC membership receives this new policy.

Welp.  It appears we pulled off the trifecta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

omigoshomigoshomigoshomigosh!

KTside.jpg

Quote

The Kirtland Temple will remain an historic building. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints plans to reopen it March 25, 2024, for public tours at no charge. Likewise, in Nauvoo, the Smith Family Homestead, the Mansion House and the Red Brick Store will also reopen on March 25, 2024, for year-round public tours at no charge.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share