• Announcements

    • Heather

      Mormon Hub Rules - Please be familiar with these rules before posting   04/17/08

        Any views expressed on Mormon Hub are independent of and do not represent the views of Mormon Hub, More Good Foundation, or Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Site Rules 1. Do not post, upload, or otherwise submit anything to the site that is derogatory towards The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, its teachings, or its leaders. Anti-LDS Propaganda will not be tolerated anywhere. 2. Please be conscious of the fact that although Mormon Hub is aimed towards an LDS audience, that the membership of this site consists of friends from an array of different backgrounds, beliefs, and cultures. Please be respectful and courteous to all, and know that everyone who is willing to follow the Rules and Terms of Mormon Hub are welcome to participate and be a member of Mormon Hub. Keep in mind that anything posted, uploaded, or otherwise displayed on the site should be understandable to friends of other faiths as well as to members. Please define any LDS vocabulary that friends of other faiths may not understand (i.e. Mutual, Relief Society, and Deacon.) 3. Personal attacks, name calling, flaming, and judgments against other members will not be tolerated. 4. No bickering and nit-picking toward others. Realize that sometimes it is very difficult to be able to express how one feels through written words. Please be courteous and ask for a further explanation, rather then trying to attack and find holes in someone else's post. 5. No cursing or crude language. Any swearing, including filter skipping, will result in an automatic one week suspension. 6. Posting issues you have with a moderator or administrator anywhere on the site will not be allowed. Please follow the chain of authority if you have any concerns. Any such posts will be removed and the poster will be subject to the consequences of breaking the rules. List of site moderators Course of action that should be taken if you have a concern: - Send a message directly to the moderator you have a concern about. If you are unable to work out the problem then, - Send a message to the head moderators. - If after you have approached both avenues, you may then send a message to Heather; however know that Heather is very unlikely to over rule anything that has been sanctioned by the moderators and head moderators. 7. Multiple accounts are not allowed and will result in all accounts being banned from the site. 8. Please do not share any "true" or "faith promoting" stories, unless you can verify the source. 9. Do not post any copyrighted material, unless the copyright is owned by you. 10. Bigoted/racial/ethnic comments will not be tolerated. Political Neutrality Policy More Good Foundation, as a nonprofit foundation, must remain neutral with respect to partisan politics and candidate campaigns for public office. The foundation encourages its members and staff to be informed about political issues and to be engaged in civic life; however, it does not endorse or oppose any political parties, candidates, or platforms. Mormon Hub will allow political discussion, also long as all posts remain neutral with respect to partisan politics and candidate campaigns for public office. You may not use the site to show support, endorse, oppose or sanction any candidate. In addition, all posts must be respectful and sensitive to readers of all political beliefs and backgrounds. Any post that violates any of the above conditions will be dealt with according to the consequences of breaking the rules. As a non-profit organization, 501©3, we are governed by legal constraints relative to writing, blogging, or otherwise endorsing any candidate running for political office. The law states, in effect, that no one acting on behalf of the nonprofit can intervene directly or indirectly in the election process by endorsing a political candidate. Any post that speaks favorably about one candidate, even in a religious context, can be construed as indirect intervention in the election process. While journalists are presently exempt from this provision, bloggers and forum-members are not. 12. You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this site to post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of any law. 13. You will not use this site to solicit the sale of any product, service or website. You will not use this site to promote a money making venture or contest. If appropriate, you may post a link to your personal website or to your business on your profile, in your forum signature, and you make create one post in the web link section of the forum. Do not post any link or discuss any business, service, or website that violates any rule of Mormon Hub. Mormon Hub is not responsible for the content of any site linked on Mormon Hub. Consequences to these rules could result in the following, and are determined on a case by case basis. Anything that an Administrator or Moderator determines is more than just an infraction of the rules, will result in immediate banning from the site and/or legal action: First infraction will result in a warning and a message from a moderator on what rule was broken. Second infraction will result in a one week suspension followed by a two week moderator post approval Third infraction will result in banned from the site for good. Any topic, message, video, music, image, or other upload or submission to the site that breaks any rules will be deleted. Please remember that we are not responsible for anything posted or uploaded. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message or upload. We are not responsible for the contents of any message, video, image, post or upload. The messages express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Mormon Hub , More Good Foundation, or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Any user who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to contact the Administration immediately by Private Message, Email, or Report a Post. We will make every effort to remove objectionable messages and uploads within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary. Mormon Hub Terms of Use Agreement January 8, 2008 Mormon Hub is a social networking service that allows Members to create unique personal profiles online in order to find and communicate with old and new friends. Mormon Hub refers to "Mormon Hub or its proprietors." The services offered by Mormon Hub ("Mormon Hub" or "we") include the Mormon Hub website (the "Mormon Hub Website"), the Mormon Hub Internet messaging service, and any other features, content, or applications offered from time to time by Mormon Hub in connection with the Mormon Hub Website (collectively, the "Mormon Hub Services"). The Mormon Hub Services are hosted in the U.S. This Terms of Use Agreement ("Agreement") sets forth the legally binding terms for your use of the Mormon Hub Services. By using the Mormon Hub Services, you agree to be bound by this Agreement, whether you are a "Visitor" (which means that you simply browse the Mormon Hub Website) or you are a "Member" (which means that you have registered with Mormon Hub). The term "User" refers to a Visitor or a Member. You are only authorized to use the Mormon Hub Services (regardless of whether your access or use is intended) if you agree to abide by all applicable laws and to this Agreement. Please read this Agreement carefully and save it. If you do not agree with it, you should leave the Mormon Hub Website and discontinue use of the Mormon Hub Services immediately. If you wish to become a Member, communicate with other Members and make use of the Mormon Hub Services, you must read this Agreement and indicate your acceptance during the Registration process. This Agreement includes Mormon Hub's policy for acceptable use of the Mormon Hub Services and Content posted on the Mormon Hub Website, your rights, obligations and restrictions regarding your use of the Mormon Hub Services and Mormon Hub's Privacy Policy. In order to participate in certain Mormon Hub Services, you may be notified that you are required to download software or content and/or agree to additional terms and conditions. Unless otherwise provided by the additional terms and conditions applicable to the Mormon Hub Services in which you choose to participate, those additional terms are hereby incorporated into this Agreement.  Mormon Hub may modify this Agreement from time to time and such modification shall be effective upon posting by Mormon Hub on the Mormon Hub Website. You agree to be bound to any changes to this Agreement when you use the Mormon Hub Services after any such modification is posted. It is therefore important that you review this Agreement regularly to ensure you are updated as to any changes. Please choose carefully the information you post on Mormon Hub and that you provide to other Users. You may NOT include any of the following information anywhere on Mormon Hub, including private messages: telephone numbers, street addresses, last names, and any photographs containing nudity, or obscene, lewd, excessively violent, harassing, sexually explicit or otherwise objectionable subject matter. Email addresses should NEVER be posted to the general public. Despite this prohibition, information provided by other Mormon Hub Members (for instance, in their Profile) may contain inaccurate, inappropriate, offensive or sexually explicit material, products or services, and Mormon Hub assumes no responsibility or liability for this material. If you become aware of misuse of the Mormon Hub Services by any person, please contact Mormon Hub or click on the "Report Inappropriate Content" link at the bottom of any Mormon Hub page. Mormon Hub reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to moderate, reject, refuse to post or remove any posting (including private messages) by you, or to restrict, suspend, or terminate your access to all or any part of the Mormon Hub Services at any time, for any or no reason, with or without prior notice, and without liability. Mormon Hub expressly reserves the right to remove your profile and/or restrict, suspend, or terminate your access to any part of Mormon Hub Services if Mormon Hub determines, in its sole discretion, that you pose a threat to Mormon Hub and/or its Users. Mormon Hub reserves the right to ask a member to change their username if it is found to be offensive or can be perceived as offensive. Due to the sacredness, this would include any usernames that include, Jesus, Christ, God, Lord, names of Prophets, General authorities etc. The names of personal or business websites, blogs, etc. to promote said sites is also prohibited. Using names of political figures or party affiliation is also prohibited. 1. Eligibility. Use of and Membership in the Mormon Hub Services is void where prohibited. By using the Mormon Hub Services, you represent and warrant that (a) all registration information you submit is truthful and accurate; ( B) you will maintain the accuracy of such information; © you are 14 years of age or older; and (d) your use of the Mormon Hub Services does not violate any applicable law or regulation. Your profile may be deleted and your Membership may be terminated without warning, if we believe that you are under 13 years of age. 2. Term. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect while you use the Mormon Hub Services or are a Member. You may terminate your Membership at any time, for any reason, emailing an admin. Mormon Hub may terminate your Membership at any time, without warning. Even after Membership is terminated, this Agreement will remain in effect, including sections 5-17. 3. Password. When you sign up to become a Member, you will also be asked to choose a password. You are entirely responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of your password. You agree not to use the account, username, or password of another Member at any time or to disclose your password to any third party. You agree to notify Mormon Hub immediately if you suspect any unauthorized use of your account or access to your password. You are solely responsible for any and all use of your account. 4. Non-commercial Use by Members. The Mormon Hub Services are for the personal use of Members only and may not be used in connection with any commercial endeavors except those that are specifically endorsed or approved by Mormon Hub. Illegal and/or unauthorized use of the Mormon Hub Services, including collecting usernames and/or email addresses of Members by electronic or other means for the purpose of sending unsolicited email or unauthorized framing of or linking to the Mormon Hub Website is prohibited. Commercial advertisements, affiliate links, and other forms of solicitation may be removed from Member profiles without notice and may result in termination of Membership privileges. Appropriate legal action will be taken for any illegal or unauthorized use of the Mormon Hub Services. 5. Proprietary Rights in Content on Mormon Hub. Mormon Hub does not claim any ownership rights in the text, files, images, photos, video, sounds, musical works, works of authorship, or any other materials (collectively, "Content") that you post to the Mormon Hub Services. After posting your Content to the Mormon Hub Services, you continue to retain all ownership rights in such Content, and you continue to have the right to use your Content in any way you choose. By displaying or publishing ("posting") any Content on or through the Mormon Hub Services, you hereby grant to Mormon Hub a limited license to use, modify, publicly perform, publicly display, reproduce, and distribute such Content solely on and through the Mormon Hub Services.
      Without this license, Mormon Hub would be unable to provide the Mormon Hub Services. For example, without the right to modify Member Content, Mormon Hub would not be able to digitally compress music files that Members submit or otherwise format Content to satisfy technical requirements, and without the right to publicly perform Member Content, Mormon Hub could not allow Users to listen to music posted by Members. The license you grant to Mormon Hub is non-exclusive (meaning you are free to license your Content to anyone else in addition to Mormon Hub), fully-paid and royalty-free (meaning that Mormon Hub is not required to pay you for the use on the Mormon Hub Services of the Content that you post), sublicensable (so that Mormon Hub is able to use its affiliates and subcontractors such as Internet content delivery networks to provide the Mormon Hub Services), and worldwide (because the Internet and the Mormon Hub Services are global in reach). This license will terminate at the time you remove your Content from the Mormon Hub Services. The license does not grant Mormon Hub the right to sell your Content, nor does the license grant Mormon Hub the right to distribute your Content outside of the Mormon Hub Services. You represent and warrant that: (i) you own the Content posted by you on or through the Mormon Hub Services or otherwise have the right to grant the license set forth in this section, and (ii) the posting of your Content on or through the Mormon Hub Services does not violate the privacy rights, publicity rights, copyrights, contract rights or any other rights of any person. You agree to pay for all royalties, fees, and any other monies owing any person by reason of any Content posted by you to or through the LDS.Mormon Hub Services. The Mormon Hub Services contain Content of Mormon Hub ("Mormon Hub Content"). Mormon Hub Content is protected by copyright, trademark, patent, trade secret and other laws, and Mormon Hub owns and retains all rights in the Mormon Hub Content and the Mormon Hub Services. Mormon Hub hereby grants you a limited, revocable, nonsublicensable license to reproduce and display the Mormon Hub Content (excluding any software code) solely for your personal use in connection with viewing the Mormon Hub Website and using the Mormon Hub Services. The Mormon Hub Services contain Content of Users and other Mormon Hub licensors. Except for Content posted by you, you may not copy, modify, translate, publish, broadcast, transmit, distribute, perform, display, or sell any Content appearing on or through the Mormon Hub Services.   6. Content Posted. Mormon Hub may delete any Content that in the sole judgment of Mormon Hub violates this Agreement or which may be offensive, illegal or violate the rights, harm, or threaten the safety of any person. Mormon Hub assumes no responsibility for monitoring the Mormon Hub Services for inappropriate Content or conduct. If at any time Mormon Hub chooses, in its sole discretion, to monitor the Mormon Hub Services, Mormon Hub nonetheless assumes no responsibility for the Content, no obligation to modify or remove any inappropriate Content, and no responsibility for the conduct of the User submitting any such Content. You are solely responsible for the Content that you post on or through any of the Mormon Hub Services, and any material or information that you transmit to other Members and for your interactions with other Users. Mormon Hub does not endorse and has no control over the Content. Content is not necessarily reviewed by Mormon Hub prior to posting and does not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of Mormon Hub. Mormon Hub makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the Content or to the accuracy and reliability of the Content or any material or information that you transmit to other Members.   7. Content/Activity Prohibited. The following is a partial list of the kind of Content that is illegal or prohibited to post on or through the Mormon Hub Services.Mormon Hub reserves the right to investigate and take appropriate legal action against anyone who, in Mormon Hub's sole discretion, violates this provision, including without limitation, removing the offending communication from the Mormon Hub Services and terminating the Membership of such violators. Prohibited Content includes, but is not limited to Content that, in the sole discretion of Mormon Hub: is patently offensive and promotes racism, bigotry, hatred or physical harm of any kind against any group or individual; harasses or advocates harassment of another person; exploits people in a sexual or violent manner; contains nudity, violence, or offensive subject matter or contains a link to an adult website; solicits personal information from anyone; provides any telephone numbers, street addresses, last names, URLs or email addresses; promotes information that you know is false or misleading or promotes illegal activities or conduct that is abusive, threatening, obscene, defamatory or libelous; promotes an illegal or unauthorized copy of another person's copyrighted work, such as providing pirated computer programs or links to them, providing information to circumvent manufacture-installed copy-protect devices, or providing pirated music or links to pirated music files; involves the transmission of "junk mail," "chain letters," or unsolicited mass mailing, instant messaging, "spimming," or "spamming"; contains restricted or password only access pages or hidden pages or images (those not linked to or from another accessible page); furthers or promotes any criminal activity or enterprise or provides instructional information about illegal activities including, but not limited to making or buying illegal weapons, violating someone's privacy, or providing or creating computer viruses; solicits passwords or personal identifying information for commercial or unlawful purposes from other Users; involves commercial activities and/or sales without our prior written consent such as contests, sweepstakes, barter, advertising, or pyramid schemes; includes a photograph of another person that you have posted without that person's consent; or uses sexually suggestive imagery or any other unfair, misleading or deceptive Content intended to draw traffic to the profile.
      The following is a partial list of the kind of activity that is illegal or prohibited on the Mormon Hub Website and through your use of the Mormon Hub Services. Mormon Hub reserves the right to investigate and take appropriate legal action against anyone who, in Mormon Hub's sole discretion, violates this provision, including without limitation, reporting you to law enforcement authorities. Prohibited activity includes, but is not limited to: criminal or tortuous activity, including child pornography, fraud, trafficking in obscene material, drug dealing, gambling, harassment, stalking, spamming, spimming, sending of viruses or other harmful files, copyright infringement, patent infringement, or theft of trade secrets; advertising to, or solicitation of, any Member to buy or sell any products or services through the Mormon Hub Services. You may not transmit any chain letters or junk email to other Members. It is also a violation of these rules to use any information obtained from the Mormon Hub Services in order to contact, advertise to, solicit, or sell to any Member without their prior explicit consent. In order to protect our Members from such advertising or solicitation, Mormon Hub reserves the right to restrict the number of emails which a Member may send to other Members in any 24-hour period to a number which Mormon Hub deems appropriate in its sole discretion. If you breach this Agreement and send unsolicited bulk email, instant messages or other unsolicited communications of any kind through the Mormon Hub Services, you acknowledge that you will have caused substantial harm to Mormon Hub, but that the amount of such harm would be extremely difficult to ascertain. As a reasonable estimation of such harm, you agree to pay Mormon Hub $50 for each such unsolicited email or other unsolicited communication you send through the Mormon Hub Services; covering or obscuring the banner advertisements on your personal profile page, or any Mormon Hub page via HTML/CSS or any other means; any automated use of the system, such as using scripts to add friends or send comments or messages; interfering with, disrupting, or creating an undue burden on the Mormon Hub Services or the networks or services connected to the Mormon Hub Services; attempting to impersonate another Member or person; copying the code for your Mormon Hub Player and embedding it into other profiles or asking other Members to embed it into their profiles; using the account, username, or password of another Member at any time or disclosing your password to any third party or permitting any third party to access your account; selling or otherwise transferring your profile; using any information obtained from the Mormon Hub Services in order to harass, abuse, or harm another person; displaying an advertisement on your profile, or accepting payment or anything of value from a third person in exchange for your performing any commercial activity on or through the Mormon Hub Services on behalf of that person, such as placing commercial content on your profile, posting blogs or bulletins with a commercial purpose, selecting a profile with a commercial purpose as one of your "Top" friends, or sending private messages with a commercial purpose; or using the Mormon Hub Services in a manner inconsistent with any and all applicable laws and regulations.   8. Copyright Policy. You may not post, modify, distribute, or reproduce in any way any copyrighted material, trademarks, or other proprietary information belonging to others without obtaining the prior written consent of the owner of such proprietary rights. It is the policy of Mormon Hub to terminate Membership privileges of any Member who repeatedly infringes the copyright rights of others upon receipt of proper notification to Mormon Hub by the copyright owner or the copyright owner's legal agent. Without limiting the foregoing, if you believe that your work has been copied and posted on the Mormon Hub Services in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please provide our Copyright Agent with the following information: (i) an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; (ii) a description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed; (iii) a description of where the material that you claim is infringing is located on the Mormon Hub Services; (iv) your address, telephone number, and email address; (v) a written statement by you that you have a good faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (vi) a statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf. 9. Member Disputes. You are solely responsible for your interactions with other Mormon Hub Members. Mormon Hub reserves the right, but has no obligation, to monitor disputes between you and other Members. 10. Privacy. Use of the Mormon Hub Services is also governed by our Privacy Policy, which is incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. 11. Disclaimers. Mormon Hub is not responsible for any incorrect or inaccurate Content posted on the Mormon Hub Website or in connection with the Mormon Hub Services, whether caused by Users of the Mormon Hub Services or by any of the equipment or programming associated with or utilized in the Mormon Hub Services. Profiles created and posted by Members on the Mormon Hub Website may contain links to other websites. Mormon Hub is not responsible for the Content, accuracy or opinions expressed on such websites, and such websites are in no way investigated, monitored or checked for accuracy or completeness by Mormon Hub. Inclusion of any linked website on the Mormon Hub Services does not imply approval or endorsement of the linked website by Mormon Hub. When you access these third-party sites, you do so at your own risk. Mormon Hub takes no responsibility for third party advertisements which are posted on this Mormon Hub Website or through the Mormon Hub Services, nor does it take any responsibility for the goods or services provided by its advertisers. Mormon Hub is not responsible for the conduct, whether online or offline, of any User of the Mormon Hub Services.Mormon Hub assumes no responsibility for any error, omission, interruption, deletion, defect, delay in operation or transmission, communications line failure, theft or destruction or unauthorized access to, or alteration of, any User or Member communication. Mormon Hub is not responsible for any problems or technical malfunction of any telephone network or lines, computer online systems, servers or providers, computer equipment, software, failure of any email or players due to technical problems or traffic congestion on the Internet or on any of the Mormon Hub Services or combination thereof, including any injury or damage to Users or to any person's computer related to or resulting from participation or downloading materials in connection with the Mormon Hub Services. Under no circumstances shall Mormon Hub be responsible for any loss or damage, including personal injury or death, resulting from use of the Mormon Hub Services, attendance at a Mormon Hub event, from any Content posted on or through the Mormon Hub Services, or from the conduct of any Users of the Mormon Hub Services, whether online or offline. The Mormon Hub Services are provided "AS-IS" and as available and Mormon Hub expressly disclaims any warranty of fitness for a particular purpose or non-infringement. Mormon Hub cannot guarantee and does not promise any specific results from use of the Mormon Hub Services. 12. Limitation on Liability. IN NO EVENT SHALL MORMON HUB BE LIABLE TO YOU OR ANY THIRD PARTY FOR ANY INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, EXEMPLARY, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, INCLUDING LOST PROFIT DAMAGES ARISING FROM YOUR USE OF THE SERVICES, EVEN IF MORMON HUB HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY CONTAINED HEREIN, MORMON HUB'S LIABILITY TO YOU FOR ANY CAUSE WHATSOEVER AND REGARDLESS OF THE FORM OF THE ACTION, WILL AT ALL TIMES BE LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID, IF ANY, BY YOU TO MORMON HUB FOR THE MORMON HUB SERVICES DURING THE TERM OF MEMBERSHIP. 13. U.S. Export Controls. Software available in connection with the Mormon Hub Services (the "Software") is further subject to United States export controls. No Software may be downloaded from the Mormon Hub Services or otherwise exported or re-exported in violation of U.S. export laws. Downloading or using the Software is at your sole risk. 14. Disputes. If there is any dispute about or involving the Mormon Hub Services, you agree that the dispute shall be governed by the laws of the State of Utah, USA, without regard to conflict of law provisions and you agree to exclusive personal jurisdiction and venue in the state and federal courts of the United States located in the State of Utah, City of Orem. Either Mormon Hub or you may demand that any dispute between Mormon Hub and you about or involving the Mormon Hub Services must be settled by arbitration utilizing the dispute resolution procedures of the American Arbitration Association (AAA) in Orem, Utah, USA, provided that the foregoing shall not prevent Mormon Hub from seeking injunctive relief in a court of competent jurisdiction. 15. Indemnity. You agree to indemnify and hold Mormon Hub, its subsidiaries, and affiliates, and their respective officers, agents, partners and employees, harmless from any loss, liability, claim, or demand, including reasonable attorneys' fees, made by any third party due to or arising out of your use of the Mormon Hub Services in violation of this Agreement and/or arising from a breach of this Agreement and/or any breach of your representations and warranties set forth above and/or if any Content that you post on theMormon Hub Website or through the Mormon Hub Services causes Mormon Hub to be liable to another. 16. Other. This Agreement is accepted upon your use of the Mormon Hub Website or any of the Mormon Hub Services and is further affirmed by you becoming a Member. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between you and Mormon Hub regarding the use of the Mormon Hub Services. The failure of Mormon Hub to exercise or enforce any right or provision of this Agreement shall not operate as a waiver of such right or provision. The section titles in this Agreement are for convenience only and have no legal or contractual effect. Mormon Hub is a trademark of Mormon Hub, Inc. This Agreement operates to the fullest extent permissible by law. If any provision of this Agreement is unlawful, void or unenforceable, that provision is deemed severable from this Agreement and does not affect the validity and enforceability of any remaining provisions. Please contact us at: Contact Mormon Hub with any questions regarding this Agreement.   Use the online HTML tidy to compose similar articles in your web browser.
    • rpframe

      IMPORTANT!! -- Login Issues   09/12/17

      TL;DR; In order to fix login issues, a lot of people will have to reset their password. As of now, if you are unable to login, please attempt a "Forgot Password"/"Password Reset" (check your spam folder) and if that doesn't work then feel free to Contact Us, for help and please check back on this post for any status updates and FAQs as we go through this process. FAQ:
      [Reserved Space]
      Firstly, I'd like to apologize on behalf of MormonHub for the frustration of the login system. There is a lot of cool things we could do with the login system, and having the logins synced up between our forum system and our front end system has been nice, but for multiple reasons (not just the current login issues), we have decided to move back to the earlier login system. While I would love to be able to migrate everyone's current passwords back, but the systems are just not compatible that way. So a large number of users will need to do a password reset. We realize that we forced everyone to do this on the move to the new system, and we sincerely apologize to everyone that will have to do it again. The Login System has now been swapped over. Give us a little bit of time to work out kinks in the system (will post updates here). If you are unable to login anymore, then please perform a password reset (check spam folder) and if that fails and we don't have any acknowledgement of problems on this post (No known problems at this time), then feel free to contact us (keeping in mind that there are a lot of you and very few of us).
Grunt

The Meaning of Atonement

Recommended Posts

Has anyone read Cleon Skousen's theory?

That's probably a dumb question.  Most of you read more than I do.  Someone tossed that on my plate this week and I'd never really thought of the deep "why" of atonement.  It's lead to a few sleepless nights of reading and study.  Is this a common Mormon belief?  Some of it makes sense, but the underlying root of intelligences and their obeyance of God only due to His honor and the possibiltiy of their rejection and the subsequent upset in power doesn't sit well with me.

Thoughts?  Are there other theories I should be looking into?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cleon Skousen is just a person.  He had no special authority (e.g. wasn't an Apostle) to reveal the word of God.  What he wrote there was his way of thinking at the time.  We should see it as such (regardless of how correct it may or may not be).  From my perspective, there were true things in there, there was a boatload of speculation or assumption in there, and at least one error.  I found it an interesting read, one that if I took the time, could probably help me see some things in a different perspective, enabling me to expand my understanding.  But I'm not going to take his word as the absolute, one-and-only true understanding how the Atonement of Christ worked (I'm not sure he's got it all in there, and I don't think mortal man is capable of understanding the mechanics, nor do I think mortal man needs to).

Keep in mind that we're forced to use mortal words for things mortals don't understand.  We're not entirely sure exactly what "intelligence" in this context means, for example.  We don't know what constitutes the "sphere" in which intelligences may be placed.  So we should be careful in our assumptions of what God (or Joseph Smith, or even Cleon Skousen) intended to communicate.  Though part of what he wrote reminded me of D&C 121:46 (emphasis mine):

Quote

46 The Holy Ghost shall be thy constant companion, and thy scepter an unchanging scepter of righteousness and truth; and thy dominion shall be an everlasting dominion, and without compulsory means it shall flow unto thee forever and ever.

As for studying the Atonement, my recommendation is that you open the Bible Dictionary and Topical Guide and read each of the individual scriptures listed there.  Take notes.  When it seems appropriate, reorganize and reword your notes. (I did this on another topic, transferring written notes from random scribbles on an 11x17 dot grid to another sheet with a bit more organization, and then I did it again.  I re-did my notes at least 3 times.)  Without the note-taking, I tend to just read rather than ponder.  So instead, I would read, and then note what I felt was most significant about the verse(s), or I would categorize them in some way (as in, these verses explain this tidbit of the Atonement).

By the time I was done, I had learned a shocking amount about something I thought I already understood completely.  Hence, my recommendation that you try it.  Let the Spirit teach you.

If you must read something from someone else, I recommend the most recent prophets and apostles to speak on the matter as they have the focus God wishes for us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Grunt said:

Has anyone read Cleon Skousen's theory?

That's probably a dumb question.  Most of you read more than I do.  Someone tossed that on my plate this week and I'd never really thought of the deep "why" of atonement.  It's lead to a few sleepless nights of reading and study.  Is this a common Mormon belief?  Some of it makes sense, but the underlying root of intelligences and their obeyance of God only due to His honor and the possibiltiy of their rejection and the subsequent upset in power doesn't sit well with me.

Thoughts?  Are there other theories I should be looking into?

For perhaps 12 or so years Cleon Skousen's version of the atonement, which he claims was taught him by Apostle Widstoe, was the best thing I had ever run into on the atonement. It was infinitely better than the average members response of "we just can't understand the atonement". I applaud Cleon for at least acknowledging that there is so much more that we can understand about the atonement and setting an example of making the effort to go beyond the no fly zone.

That said, few people will ever put the effort into the process to understand where Cleon misses the mark.  You actually are at the root of the issue now as Cleon mis-emphasizes the role of God's creations in the narrative giving them far too much "power" in the process of God remaining God. His emphasis places God at the mercy of all of the intelligences and it simply is not that way.  And in fact properly understood that part of Cleon's narrative fades away into obscurity.

Nonetheless, there is not much information out there that really delves into the Atonement and I consider it a doctrine that has so many moving parts that it is purely the exhausting efforts of years of study that provides the necessary fodder for the spirit to teach you of these things.  When I study, I write in a Thesis sort of format. I have been working on my atonement document for, I think it is going on ten years now and it is over 600 pages long. The challenge becomes that even after you learn the material there is very little opportunity to share as without building on the line upon line foundation others cannot grasp the fascinating intricacies that becomes the greatest event to ever take place.

I can give you the benefit of some of the questions to ask that must be understood before you can work your way through the process.

You must grasp the material of the Fall.

1.) Who is the law Giver in the Garden.  Who is the judge in the Garden?

2.) Why was a death sentence an appropriate judgement for Adam and Eve?  Why was Satan cast out, when Adam and Eve were allowed a Savior. What kind of people dwell in a telestial state.  Why is that state an appropriate place for fallen mankind?

3.) What does Alma 12 provide us in understanding about who becomes the lawgiver and the second set of laws we must now conform to. Why is this significant

4.)What does the story of Cain and Able teach us about the privilege accorded to those who have shed innocent blood? 

5.) What really is Alma 34:11-16 saying. You'll have to make a paradigm shift just to grasp it.

6.) What prevents God the Father from exercising mercy without Christ shedding his blood? Why can't he just say, "Never mind Son, just pick the friends you like and bring them on home"?

7.) If mercy cannot rob justice, but justice requires a specific breach be rectified then the only way for justice to not be robbed is for justice to demand mercy.  Otherwise mercy cannot fulfill the demands of justice because justice has its specific requirements. It is not a substitution program. How is that accomplished?

8.) Why would God cease to be God if mercy robbed justice?

9.) The best quote I have ever found which indicates that Elder Eyring clearly understands a key element of the atonement is this one:

Quote

 

Question: What exactly is the atonement and how can I receive its blessings and one thing I have always wondered but have never been able to find my answer to is how do I access the atonement. Is all I have to do is just ask God for the atonement to take place in my life?

President Eyring: Could I … First thing to do is to get a few facts straight.  The atonement was something that Jesus Christ Did.  It's not a thing itself he atoned for our sins and he paid the price to allow us to be forgiven and to be resurrected...alright, so it's what he did that qualified him to give us forgiveness to change our hearts and it's the Holy Ghost that is doing that.It's not the atonement as if it is a thing itself. 

The atonement is something the Savior did and the Father has given Him, because of that great sacrifice that He made for us, the power to forgive us.  And so when you feel forgiveness that is not the atonement - that's the Savior giving you a feeling of forgiveness because of the atonement.(President Henry B. Eyring, Transcribed from the Face To Face event, March 4th 2017 )

 

Most will read it and not see anything of significance. Expand on this quote for what it is really saying and one of the key elements of the atonement will be manifest - this is related to number 5 above.  I could go on with more questions but this is enough for your first five years of study...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A question that I sometime ponder about the atonement is who determined the sin to suffering ratio and how was this determined. If Jesus suffered more than was required, that would be unjust for Christ, but God is not unjust, and for Him to allow His Son to suffer more than what was required would be unjust. I also suspect He would not allow or require His Son to suffer more than what was needed. If Christ suffered less than what was needed, then that would also be unjust because the requirements of justice would not be met. So I suspect that the amount of Christ's suffering was directly related to precisely the amount of sin that needed to be atoned for, no more and no less. So what and who determines how much sin results in how much suffering?

Two related questions: 1) what happens if the overarching, universal laws of justice that govern the atonement were thrown out, and rejected/disobeyed, and who/what is it that would deliver/implement/administer the consequences of abandoning the laws of justice.

2) Why does the penalty/consequences for sin have to be suffering? Why can't it be something else? For example, one parent might use corporal punishment (suffering) as a penalty/consequence for disobedience. Another parent might use a period of isolation or time-out, while another parent might issue a work order. Why is suffering, rather than something else, the penalty for sin?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, askandanswer said:

A question that I sometime ponder about the atonement is who determined the sin to suffering ratio and how was this determined. If Jesus suffered more than was required, that would be unjust for Christ, but God is not unjust, and for Him to allow His Son to suffer more than what was required would be unjust. I also suspect He would not allow or require His Son to suffer more than what was needed. If Christ suffered less than what was needed, then that would also be unjust because the requirements of justice would not be met. So I suspect that the amount of Christ's suffering was directly related to precisely the amount of sin that needed to be atoned for, no more and no less. So what and who determines how much sin results in how much suffering?

I believe this to be too mechanical or legalistic a view of the Atonement.  There was no list of all the sins everyone had, was, or would commit, with all the mitigating circumstances, and their corresponding just punishments.  There was sin.  There is a consequence to sin.  That consequence had to be overcome, mastered, subdued.  Then, the one who mastered it would have full command of the consequences.  Or something like that.  It seems I'm having a hard time coming up with words beyond these, so they'll have to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, zil said:

I believe this to be too mechanical or legalistic a view of the Atonement.  There was no list of all the sins everyone had, was, or would commit, with all the mitigating circumstances, and their corresponding just punishments.  There was sin.  There is a consequence to sin.  That consequence had to be overcome, mastered, subdued.  Then, the one who mastered it would have full command of the consequences.  Or something like that.  It seems I'm having a hard time coming up with words beyond these, so they'll have to do.

God, first and foremost, abides by the law. And the law in and of itself, is empty and insufficient, until given meaning and effect by the addition of rules and regulations and judicial interpretation. 

I believe that behind every doctrine, every teaching, every principle of the kingdom lies and enormous amount of, for want of a better phrase, rules and regulations and fine print. Broad principles and law are too general to make consistent decisions for the enormously varied and complex situations in which humans find themselves at some point. There needs to be something much more detailed and specific than broad principles. Yes, there is sin, and as soon as you acknowledge the concept of sin, to have meaning, it needs to be defined, and then as soon as you come up with a definition, you then have to start considering all the ifs and buts and maybes, and to answer all of those you need the aforementioned fine print. And yes, there are consequences to be overcome, and as soon as you accept that idea, you need to precisely identify/define the "overcome" point so that you know when you've reached it.

I also see a need for some sort of laws/rules/regulations to govern the transfer of power from whoever/whatever controlled the consequences of sin prior to the time when the atonement came into effect, to the Being who took control of them once the atonement came into affect. I suspect that these things happen in an orderly, law abiding, perhaps even legalistic manner.

These kind of things are too important to be left to chance .God is a God of order, and these things are probably governed by order. I think there are opportunities for learning by inquiring into what that order might be

Edited by askandanswer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Grunt said:

Thoughts?  Are there other theories I should be looking into?

I would whole heartily recommend Elder David A Bednar's three series books:

1) Increase in Learning

2) Act in Doctrine

3) The Power to Become

These books provide some great thoughts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, askandanswer said:

A question that I sometime ponder about the atonement is who determined the sin to suffering ratio and how was this determined. If Jesus suffered more than was required, that would be unjust for Christ, but God is not unjust, and for Him to allow His Son to suffer more than what was required would be unjust. I also suspect He would not allow or require His Son to suffer more than what was needed. If Christ suffered less than what was needed, then that would also be unjust because the requirements of justice would not be met. So I suspect that the amount of Christ's suffering was directly related to precisely the amount of sin that needed to be atoned for, no more and no less. So what and who determines how much sin results in how much suffering?

Two related questions: 1) what happens if the overarching, universal laws of justice that govern the atonement were thrown out, and rejected/disobeyed, and who/what is it that would deliver/implement/administer the consequences of abandoning the laws of justice.

2) Why does the penalty/consequences for sin have to be suffering? Why can't it be something else? For example, one parent might use corporal punishment (suffering) as a penalty/consequence for disobedience. Another parent might use a period of isolation or time-out, while another parent might issue a work order. Why is suffering, rather than something else, the penalty for sin?

This is a challenge to put into words and have it make sense but I'll try.  One of the Key aspects of the Atonement was to repair the breech caused by Adam and Eve transgressing the Law that was given them in the Garden of Eden.  Their judgment was to be removed from the presence of God the Father which is the equivalent of spiritual death.  The atonement is what allows all of us to return to the presence of our Father in Heaven.  So Christ's pays the price to allow us to come back into the presence of the Father.  This price is exacted by the first law of the Garden of Eden as that was the one that was broken.  However, all of yours and I's sins are after the fact of the first law of the Garden. They do not exist as part of the burden of the price exacted by the first law of the garden of Eden. Is the price being paid then the result of sins that were not even committed? Or is something else being addressed?

Question number 1.  We tend to look at justice as the bad guy in the scenario because we are always looking at it from our perspective of justice demands we suffer for our sins.  However what if justice is the reason the atonement works.  Go back to the first real story in the Bible where Cain slays Able. It begins teaching us of the atonement in the very first story and we learn something.  We learn that innocent blood can make demands on the law giver and so Able's Blood cries out unto the Lord for justice. Right? Completely change your paradigm and now focus on Jesus Christ as the innocent blood that was Shed.  Don't look at justice for how it impacts us for our sins but look at justice for how it empowers Christ because he has no sins and dies innocently.  When he cries out for justice, who is obligated to answer that plea? What does that imply?

Question number 2. I am out of time for the moment but I'll toss out a couple of things:

 

Quote

 

D&C 45:3–5

3. Listen to [Jesus Christ] who is the advocate with the Father, who is pleading your cause before him—

4. Saying: Father, behold the sufferings and death of him who did no sin, in whom thou wast well pleased; behold the blood of thy Son which was shed, the blood of him whom thou gavest that thyself might be glorified;

5. Wherefore, Father, spare these my brethren that believe on my name, that they may come unto me and have everlasting life

 

Again, the only way to understand the atonement is to completely reverse the paradigm and look at it from God the Fathers perspective.  Your question is from the perspective of man.  Man sins - he deserves to be punished - case closed. However suffering as it plays into the effectiveness of the atonement is that when an innocent person, in this case Christ suffers, when he did not sin, then he is building a claim which is made to the law giver to whom he is subject.  Notice above that Christ cites his suffering as part of what has to be considered by the Father when he stands as our advocate.  His suffering gives him rights that he would not have otherwise and those rights play into his ability to have expectations of his Fathers consideration.  Consider this verse as well:

Quote

 

Moroni 7:27

27 Wherefore, my beloved brethren, have miracles ceased because Christ hath ascended into heaven, and hath sat down on the right hand of God, to claim of the Father his rights of mercy which he hath upon the children of men?

 28 For he hath answered the ends of the law, and he claimeth all those who have faith in him; and they who have faith in him will cleave unto every good thing; wherefore he advocateth the cause of the children of men; and he dwelleth eternally in the heavens.

 

Now for a final thought about how suffering justly or because you broke a law simply pays the demands of the law, however that means that if one suffers when one broke no law then that must be addressed and recompensed.  So where you are seeing suffering as penalty it has a bonus side for those who are repentant.  Because there is much suffering where you did no sin you also get to make an appeal to your law giver which is different than Christ's Law giver as described in Alma 12.  Yours is Jesus Christ. Contemplate these words by L. Todd Christofferson:

Quote

The Savior’s suffering in Gethsemane and His agony on the cross redeem us from sin by satisfying the demands that justice has upon us. He extends mercy and pardons those who repent. The Atonement also satisfies the debt justice owes to us by healing and compensating us for any suffering we innocently endure. “For behold, he suffereth the pains of all men, yea, the pains of every living creature, both men, women, and children, who belong to the family of Adam” (2 Nephi 9:21; see also Alma 7:11–12). (Redemption, Christofferson, D. Todd, Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, April Conference 2013)

 

Edited by brlenox

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, askandanswer said:

God, first and foremost, abides by the law. And the law in and of itself, is empty and insufficient, until given meaning and effect by the addition of rules and regulations and judicial interpretation. 

I believe that behind every doctrine, every teaching, every principle of the kingdom lies and enormous amount of, for want of a better phrase, rules and regulations and fine print. Broad principles and law are too general to make consistent decisions for the enormously varied and complex situations in which humans find themselves at some point. There needs to be something much more detailed and specific than broad principles. Yes, there is sin, and as soon as you acknowledge the concept of sin, to have meaning, it needs to be defined, and then as soon as you come up with a definition, you then have to start considering all the ifs and buts and maybes, and to answer all of those you need the aforementioned fine print. And yes, there are consequences to be overcome, and as soon as you accept that idea, you need to precisely identify/define the "overcome" point so that you know when you've reached it.

I also see a need for some sort of laws/rules/regulations to govern the transfer of power from whoever/whatever controlled the consequences of sin prior to the time when the atonement came into effect, to the Being who took control of them once the atonement came into affect. I suspect that these things happen in an orderly, law abiding, perhaps even legalistic manner.

These kind of things are too important to be left to chance .God is a God of order, and these things are probably governed by order. I think there are opportunities for learning by inquiring into what that order might be

I agree that God acts in harmony with eternal laws and that his house is one of order.  But I think the majority of what you describe is projecting mortal needs and failings onto God.  God is the perfect, omniscient judge, as is Christ.  They do not need fine print (Christ found fault with the scribes and Pharisees for creating fine print).  When we reach that point, we will not need fine print.

I don't believe Christ paid the finite price for a finite list of sins, I believe he overcame the entire concept of sin, that somehow, in a finite amount of time, he endured something eternal and infinite, paid the infinite price and overcame the eternal consequences of sin - not sins.  And I don't believe someone handed him a "Mastery of the Consequences of Sin" certificate - I believe he accomplished this mastery.  I don't believe this is like a set of physical reins which can only be held by one person at a time, but rather a skill or accomplishment that any number of people could, in theory, accomplish.

All that said, these are nothing more than ways of thinking about it.  I don't believe we'll ever fully understand how Christ accomplished the Atonement - I think without the experience, without having never succumbed to temptation, we cannot understand.  I could be wrong, and I'm open to learning more, including different perspectives like the article linked in the OP.  But age has taken me away from thinking like you describe, not toward it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Grunt said:

Has anyone read Cleon Skousen's theory?

That's probably a dumb question.  Most of you read more than I do.  Someone tossed that on my plate this week and I'd never really thought of the deep "why" of atonement.  It's lead to a few sleepless nights of reading and study.  Is this a common Mormon belief?  Some of it makes sense, but the underlying root of intelligences and their obeyance of God only due to His honor and the possibiltiy of their rejection and the subsequent upset in power doesn't sit well with me.

Thoughts?  Are there other theories I should be looking into?

I hadn't read this article before as I've always been a little wary of Skousen, a prejudice I inherited from my father. I read it earlier today and for the most part, I think its one idea among many, and its a matter of personal preference how much belief/credibility one chooses to attach to it. 

The part that you didn't like is the part that I found to be most interesting. I've sometimes wondered how it could happen that God could cease to be God, and what might happen if God violated certain laws. This article suggests a possible answer, which to me, sort of sounds plausible, that answer being, God could cease to be God if those who sustain Him in that position no longer chose to do so. In such an event, God's power and knowledge and ability to act would in no way be lessened, but there can only be a leader if there are things (intelligences) to be led, and if those being led lost confidence in their leader because their leader broke some sort of fundamental law, that leader, while retaining their position and power, would no longer occupy the position they previously had. Sort of like a general whose troops had all deserted him - still holding the rank, power and privileges of general but less useful than before and not able to do as much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, askandanswer said:

God, first and foremost, abides by the law.

I wonder about that. To me, it makes God subordinate to the law--making the law the end rather than the means to the end that is God.

I see it as the other way around, thereby providing the means and justification for properly dealing with paradoxes--not the least of which is willfully and knowingly sacrificing one's son, or sacrificing oneself, for the sins of others. In a sense, the atonement required violation of the law prohibiting suicide, but violation of that law made God no less God, but rather it made God all the more God.

Another paradox is that the sacrament, commanded by God, involves the symbolic violation of the law against cannibalism.

There are others, but this should suffice.

In short, the means that is the law is rightly subordinate to the end that is God.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Grunt said:

Thoughts?  Are there other theories I should be looking into?

There are a number of theories on the atonement. Some are generic christian theories and some are specifically LDS. General theories include the moral influence theory, the ransom theory, the satisfaction theory, and the penal substitution theory (many LDS members talk in these terms about the atonement). Some specific LDS theories include the demand of eternal intelligences for justice theory, the empathy theory, the divine infusion theory, and the compassion theory. You could do a search for any of these to learn more. I myself am partial to the divine infusion theory as far as it goes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, james12 said:

There are a number of theories on the atonement. Some are generic christian theories and some are specifically LDS. General theories include the moral influence theory, the ransom theory, the satisfaction theory, and the penal substitution theory (many LDS members talk in these terms about the atonement). Some specific LDS theories include the demand of eternal intelligences for justice theory, the empathy theory, the divine infusion theory, and the compassion theory. You could do a search for any of these to learn more. I myself am partial to the divine infusion theory as far as it goes. 

I'll start googling.  Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, wenglund said:

I wonder about that. To me, it makes God subordinate to the law--making the law the end rather than the means to the end that is God.

I see it as the other way around, thereby providing the means and justification for properly dealing with paradoxes--not the least of which is willfully and knowingly sacrificing one's son, or sacrificing oneself, for the sins of others. In a sense, the atonement required violation of the law prohibiting suicide, but violation of that law made God no less God, but rather it made God all the more God.

Another paradox is that the sacrament, commanded by God, involves the symbolic violation of the law against cannibalism.

There are others, but this should suffice.

In short, the means that is the law is rightly subordinate to the end that is God.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

IMO, you are citing laws for mortals.  I don't think the laws for celestial immortals are necessarily the same.  I tend to think of the laws to which God is subject as being more like the laws of physics - gravity just is - defy it, and you go splat on the sidewalk; master it (and some others) and you can fly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Grunt said:

Thoughts?  

 

Some of my personal thoughts – but with a disclaimer.  I believe any individual can receive, through the gift of the Holy Ghost, revelation (including new revelation) concerning doctrine.  But all revelation concerning the law, covenants and ordinances must come through the proper channels of priesthood authority.

The word or term “Atonement” is a made-up word by Tyndall (as part of his fist English translation of Biblical scripture).  The word was made up because there was no translation in English for the ancient texts.   In short there is no common English understanding of this ancient idea so a word was made up to make some attempt to encapsulate an understanding completely lost during the Great Apostasy.

Because I work with industrial artificial intelligence in my little consulting business – I believe that I have gained some interesting insights.  I am not trying to argue but rather introduce some ideas.  The first idea is the idea of what is called the intelligence (or artificial intelligence) of the Hive Mind.  For most of human history it was believed that the greatest intelligence was some “super” single intelligence – greater that all other.  In essence, this construct was strongly imbedded in our religious belief in G-d.  G-d being the quintessential super single intelligence.  As we have scientifically sought to develop artificial intelligence we have discovered that a hive or collective intelligence significantly outperforms a super centralized intelligence.  The greater the distribution of intelligence the greater the intelligent advantage. 

This collective concept of a hive mind intelligence has influenced my personal understanding of G-ds and the idea of the plurality of G-d and becoming “one” with G-d.  Most LDS carry the concept of a Celestial being as individual that is divinely superior – but as I understand marriage as a sealing and uniting and that all Celestial beings are sealed as a singular family – I am inclined to think that much more is going on and that though we are individuals that there is an eternal and divine union that binds all Celestial beings.  I am inclined to think that what we call “The Atonement” makes this possible and is included in this eternal and divine binding unification of Celestial beings.

I believe there is another part of what we call “The Atonement”.  This has to do with a term we LDS call “Agency”.  I believe agency is a divine gift from G-d and is distinctly different than our individual will – even though our agency is exercised through our individual will.  Because agency is a divine gift it comes with “strings” attached.  Along with our agency there is law.  Agency gives us power to sin which is a transgression of the law.  Thus, our agency gives us power to exercise or transgress the law.  There are consequences (both benedictions and maledictions) for exercising the law. 

Jesus is the proctor of both our agency and the law.  This makes him the rightful “Law Giver” as well as the overseer of our agency.  This means that one of the strings of our agency is that we are bound to Jesus as the proctor and law giver such that he is complicit with us for the sins we commit.  This means that in order that justice be exercised in the law that all consequences (both benedictions and maledictions) of the law must be shared.  I believe this is why Jesus could perform an act to pay for our sins (because he was both the law giver and proctor of our agency) but this also means that we must work jointly with him and his redemption to have full benefit of his redemption or payment.  The term we use to define the working jointly with Christ is what we in the English language call “The Atonement”. 

So I believe the atonement is becoming one with G-d – not just to overcome sin but to exercise the laws of eternal life – to be G-d and share the divine intelligence of Celestial beings.

 

The Traveler

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, wenglund said:

I wonder about that. To me, it makes God subordinate to the law--making the law the end rather than the means to the end that is God.

I see it as the other way around, thereby providing the means and justification for properly dealing with paradoxes--not the least of which is willfully and knowingly sacrificing one's son, or sacrificing oneself, for the sins of others. In a sense, the atonement required violation of the law prohibiting suicide, but violation of that law made God no less God, but rather it made God all the more God.

Another paradox is that the sacrament, commanded by God, involves the symbolic violation of the law against cannibalism.

There are others, but this should suffice.

In short, the means that is the law is rightly subordinate to the end that is God.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

I think that the examples you have mentioned here are examples of laws that God has made for us, His children, and not for himself. As shown in the scriptures, God can break these kind of laws without consequence, probably because they are not binding on Him, but there are other laws that God cannot break without suffering some kind of consequence, eg Alma 42:13. Therefore, according to justice, the plan of redemption could not be brought about, only on conditions of repentance of men in this probationary state, yea, this preparatory state; for except it were for these conditions, mercy could not take effect except it should destroy the work of justice.  Now the work of justice could not be destroyed; if so, God would cease to be God. I believe that there are other laws that pre-date the existence of God, and to which God is subject. An example of this kind of law are laws of justice and I suspect there are many others. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, zil said:

I agree that God acts in harmony with eternal laws and that his house is one of order.  But I think the majority of what you describe is projecting mortal needs and failings onto God.  God is the perfect, omniscient judge, as is Christ.  They do not need fine print (Christ found fault with the scribes and Pharisees for creating fine print).  When we reach that point, we will not need fine print.

I don't believe Christ paid the finite price for a finite list of sins, I believe he overcame the entire concept of sin, that somehow, in a finite amount of time, he endured something eternal and infinite, paid the infinite price and overcame the eternal consequences of sin - not sins.  And I don't believe someone handed him a "Mastery of the Consequences of Sin" certificate - I believe he accomplished this mastery.  I don't believe this is like a set of physical reins which can only be held by one person at a time, but rather a skill or accomplishment that any number of people could, in theory, accomplish.

All that said, these are nothing more than ways of thinking about it.  I don't believe we'll ever fully understand how Christ accomplished the Atonement - I think without the experience, without having never succumbed to temptation, we cannot understand.  I could be wrong, and I'm open to learning more, including different perspectives like the article linked in the OP.  But age has taken me away from thinking like you describe, not toward it.

I've thought about this a little more and have temporarily concluded that whether Christ overcame the eternal consequneces of sin or or sins doesn't matter to much. Regardless of whether it was sin or sins, someone still needed to decide how much suffering was required to reach the desired objective. How and by whom it was decided what that end point was continue to be thought provoking questions. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, zil said:

I believe this to be too mechanical or legalistic a view of the Atonement.

Bingo.

I believe that it is possible to understand Christ's atonement. In fact, like any other eternal principle, the atonement of Jesus Christ is understood step by step. Each of us has some level of understanding of that principle. Our understanding may be shallow or it may be strong. One thing that is certain is that, if we pursue the path of truth, we will understand Jesus' atoning sacrifice vastly more at some future day than we do now.

I am not a W. Cleon Skousen fan. (More of a Royal Skousen fan, actually,) I have a lot of admiration for Skousen. I think he was a good and highly intelligent man who read, pondered, and really meditated on gospel topics. His explanation of the law of Moses in an appendix of his book The First Two Thousand Years (or maybe it was The Third Thousand Years -- I'm not sure) was the best thing I had ever read to that point on the topic, and really opened up my understanding of the law of Moses. So if I'm not a Skousen fan, I'm certainly no Skousen detractor. But Skousen's works have built up a rabid fan following, sometimes seeming almost cultic. I doubt Skousen himself would have been (or was) comfortable with that.

Anyway, Skousen thought that Elder Widtsoe had guided him to deep truths about the Savior's atonement. I don't know; maybe he did. But like much of Skousen's writings, his descriptions about this lifelong, ongoing event is very mechanistic. It is my belief that understanding divinity does not primarily take place at the mechanical level. We don't believe or understand God and his relationship to us because we are well acquainted with the mechanics of his creations of the world and of ourselves. We don't know such things. But at this stage, the mechanics are irrelevant. I believe that the mechanics of the atonement in God's plan of salvation are likewise not relevant to our understanding of its meaning and how we invite Christ into our lives.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, zil said:

IMO, you are citing laws for mortals.  I don't think the laws for celestial immortals are necessarily the same.  I tend to think of the laws to which God is subject as being more like the laws of physics - gravity just is - defy it, and you go splat on the sidewalk; master it (and some others) and you can fly.

I don't necessarily disagree. I just believe that the earthly is a reflection (type and shadow) of the heavenly--that is to say that, to me, all things in the physical universe testify of God, though he be too oft hidden in plain sight.

If you take a look at Dr. Peterson's presentations linked above, you may see what I mean. He creatively uses science to help comprehend the religious, the physical to reveal the spiritual.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, wenglund said:

I don't necessarily disagree. I just believe that the earthly is a reflection (type and shadow) of the heavenly--that is to say that, to me, all things in the physical universe testify of God, though he be too oft hidden in plain sight.

I agree on this, I guess it was just the examples that I thought didn't fit. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, askandanswer said:

I think that the examples you have mentioned here are examples of laws that God has made for us, His children, and not for himself. As shown in the scriptures, God can break these kind of laws without consequence, probably because they are not binding on Him, but there are other laws that God cannot break without suffering some kind of consequence, eg Alma 42:13. Therefore, according to justice, the plan of redemption could not be brought about, only on conditions of repentance of men in this probationary state, yea, this preparatory state; for except it were for these conditions, mercy could not take effect except it should destroy the work of justice.  Now the work of justice could not be destroyed; if so, God would cease to be God. I believe that there are other laws that pre-date the existence of God, and to which God is subject. An example of this kind of law are laws of justice and I suspect there are many others. 

That makes sense to me. Perhaps the inviolate godly laws you mentioned are along the lines of the Judeo-Christian notion of the U.S. Presidency wherein a distinction is made between the office and the person holding the office, with the former being considered as the law, thus making the later not above the law, but subject to it. The same may be the case for the office of God. It is neither above or below the law because it is the law itself (or the end thereof), whereas the person holding the office is subject thereto. 

Something to consider. I am grateful that you caused me to reconsider, otherwise I would missed what followed. [Thumbs up]

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

Edited by wenglund

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Vort said:

Bingo.

I believe that it is possible to understand Christ's atonement. In fact, like any other eternal principle, the atonement of Jesus Christ is understood step by step. Each of us has some level of understanding of that principle. Our understanding may be shallow or it may be strong. One thing that is certain is that, if we pursue the path of truth, we will understand Jesus' atoning sacrifice vastly more at some future day than we do now.

Yup. The more the atonement is active in our day-to-day living, the greater the understanding. As with many principles of the Gospel, comprehension flows from experiencing and doing, or in other words by living an atoned-filled life..

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now